Cited by 41Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Family involvement in the youth mentoring process: A focus group study with program staff

Spencer, Renée, Basualdo-Delmonico, Antoinette·2014·Children and Youth Services Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.013

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Spencer, R., & Basualdo-Delmonico, A.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Renée
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
41
Pages
75-82
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081483750
Cited by
41
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Annie E. Casey Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
youth mentoring, family involvement, mentoring programs, at-risk youth, Big Brothers Big Sisters, family collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review