Cited by 167Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentChild Welfare and AdoptionYouth Development and Social Support

A systemic model of the youth mentoring intervention

Keller, Thomas E.·2005·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

Conceptual and empirical work on youth mentoring naturally tends to focus on the relationship between mentor and child. However, the parent/guardian and agency caseworker also may contribute to the success or failure of the mentoring intervention, and program effects may be partially mediated by the child's interactions with these individuals. This article presents a systemic model of mentoring depicting the interdependent network of relationships established between mentor, child, parent/guardian, and caseworker against the backdrop of agency policies and procedures. Numerous examples illustrate pathways of influence and patterns of communication in the context of this more holistic model of mentoring. Editors' Strategic Implications: Drawing upon ecological and systems theories, the author provides a promising conceptual model that focuses on patterns of interpersonal exchange among several key individuals (but not the only possible ones). This model reminds researchers and practitioners that mentoring resides within a mutually reinforcing (or inhibiting) network of other relationships. This systemic thinking has implications for child welfare agency policies and practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-005-1850-2

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reported impact of these practices is consistent with Keller's systemic, ecological model of mentoring, which posits that the mentoring process is influenced by external social networks that play a central role in scaffolding the development and maintenance of the relationship.

    “The reported impact of these practices is consistent with Keller’s systemic, ecological model of mentoring [176], which posits that the mentoring process is influenced by the external social networks that play a central role in scaffolding the development and the maintenance of the relationship.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keller, T. E.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Keller, Thomas E.
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2005-03
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
169-188
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W2076897679
Cited by
167
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Spencer Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH067129)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
youth mentoring, systemic model, child protection services, ecological systems theory, interpersonal exchange, child welfare interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Communication, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mentors, Parent-Child Relations, Case Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review