Cited by 12Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Effectiveness of a culturally-attuned integrated cognitive behavioural therapy for Chinese young people with drug abuse in Hong Kong

Wong, Daniel Fu Keung, Zhuang, Xiao Yu, Ng, Ting Kin·2020·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104970

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, D. F. K., Zhuang, X. Y., & Ng, T. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Lingnan University (HK)
Corresponding author
Wong, Daniel Fu Keung
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
113
Pages
104970
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014118161
Cited by
11
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Beat Drugs Fund of the Narcotics Division
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
youth drug abuse, motivational interviewing, relapse prevention, dysfunctional attitudes, negative emotions, quality of life, treatment effectiveness, Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review