Cited by 39Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence, age of initiation, and patterns of co-occurrence of digital dating abuse behaviors nationwide

Open access
Ellyson, Alice M., Adhia, Avanti, Lyons, Vivian H., Rivara, Frederick P.·2021·Children and Youth Services Review

Abstract

Introduction Little is known about the patterns of adolescent and young adult digital dating abuse (DDA) nationwide. This study characterizes (1) the lifetime prevalence, (2) the age of initiation, and (3) the patterns of co-occurrence of both using and experiencing DDA behaviors in dating relationships. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among a sample of 696 U.S. young adults recruited from Prolific, an online research platform. The sample was 50.7% female, 43.7% male, and 5.6% gender non-binary or transgender. The average age was 18.7 years (SD = 0.63, range: 16-22). Results & conclusions Among those with dating experience, 76.1% (n = 530) reported either using or experiencing at least one DDA behavior in their lifetime. Overall, 42.9% of respondents reported using and 58.3% experiencing digital monitoring and control behaviors, 25.0% reported using and 49.2% experiencing digital direct aggression, and 12.4% reported using and 36.4% experiencing digital sexual coercion. The average age of initiation for most DDA behaviors was 16 years with respondents reporting experiencing these behaviors at 11 years of age at the earliest. Of those with any involvement with DDA, 59.2% report both using at least one DDA behavior and experiencing at least one DDA behavior (n = 314), 32.5% report experiencing at least one DDA behavior but not using any (n = 172), and 8.3% report using at least one DDA behavior but not experiencing any (n = 44). DDA behaviors are common, can occur at young ages. Our findings highlight crossover between those who use and those who experience DDA behaviors and suggest prevention should focus on underlying issues that drive both the use and experience of these behaviors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105921

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cyber-control behaviors are considerably more frequent than cyber-aggression behaviors in adolescent couples.

    “the cyber-control behaviors are considerably more frequent than cyberaggression behaviors”

    From Romantic myths and cyber dating violence victimization in Spanish adolescents: A moderated mediation model (2023) · cites this paper as Ellyson et al., 2021

    The Results (Lifetime DDA Prevalence) report more monitoring-and-control than direct-aggression behaviors, both used (42.9% versus 25.0%) and experienced (58.3% versus 49.2%). However, the Methods (Design and Procedure) describe a survey of young adults about lifetime dating experiences, not a prevalence comparison confined to adolescent couples. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Arseneault, 2017, The long-term impact of bullying victimization on mental health, World Psychiatry, 16, 27, 10.1002/wps.20399 · DOI
  2. Benedict, 2015, Mental health and bullying in the United States aamong children aged 6 to 17 years, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 782, 10.1177/0886260514536279 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bennett, D. C., Guran, E. L., Ramos, M. C., & Margolin, G. (2011). College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and Victims 26(4), 410–429. · DOI
  4. Borrajo, 2015, Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression, Psychological Reports, 116, 565, 10.2466/21.16.PR0.116k22w4 · DOI
  5. Brown, C. & Hegarty, K. (2018). Digital dating abuse measures: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 40(May-June 2018), 44–59. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.003. · DOI
  6. Clancy, 2020, Sharing is not always caring: Understanding motivations and behavioural associations with sext dissemination, Computers in Human Behavior, 112
  7. Dilmaghani, 2018, The racial “digital divide” in the predictive power of Google trends data for forecasting the unemployment rate, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 43, 119, 10.3233/JEM-180458 · DOI
  8. Hinduja, 2020, Digital dating abuse among a national sample of U.S. youth, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1
  9. Jennings, 2017, Dating and intimate partner violence among young persons ages 15–30: Evidence from a systematic review, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 107, 10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.007 · DOI
  10. Koker, 2014, A systematic review of interventions for preventing adolescent intimate partner violence, Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, 3, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.08.008 · DOI
  11. Korchmaros, 2013, Perpetration of teen dating violence in a networked society, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 10.1089/cyber.2012.0627 · DOI
  12. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, 2012, Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review, Partner Abuse, 3, 199, 10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.199 · DOI
  13. Lenhart, 2005, Teens and technology, Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation.
  14. Lereya, 2015, Bully/victims: A longitudinal, population-based cohort study of their mental health, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, 1461, 10.1007/s00787-015-0705-5 · DOI
  15. Lucero, 2014, Exploring gender differences: socially interactive technology use/abuse among dating teens, Affilia, 29, 478, 10.1177/0886109914522627 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Reed, L. A., Conn, K., & Wachter, K. (2020). Name-calling, jealousy, and break-ups: Teen girls’ and boys’ worst experiences of digital dating. Children and Youth Services Review 108(November 2019), 104607. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104607. · DOI
  17. Reed, 2016, Snooping and sexting: Digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students, Violence Against Women, 22, 1556, 10.1177/1077801216630143 · DOI
  18. Reed, 2018, The association between stereotypical gender and dating beliefs and digital dating abuse perpetration in adolescent dating relationships, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–25
  19. Stonard, 2014, The relevance of technology to the nature, prevalence, and impact of Adolescent Dating Violence and Abuse: A research synthesis, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 390, 10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.005 · DOI
  20. Stonard, 2015, “They’ll Always Find a Way to Get to You”: Technology use in adolescent romantic relationships and its role in dating violence and abuse, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 2083, 10.1177/0886260515590787 · DOI
  21. Taylor, 2016, A national descriptive portrait of adolescent relationship abuse: Results from the national survey on teen relationships and intimate violence, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 963, 10.1177/0886260514564070 · DOI
  22. Tolman, 1999, The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory, Violence and Victims, 14, 25, 10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.25 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Tynes, 2014, Black youth beyond the digital divide: Age and gender differences in internet use, communication patterns, and victimization experiences, Journal of Black Psychology, 40, 291, 10.1177/0095798413487555 · DOI
  24. Vagi, 2015, Teen dating violence (physical and sexual) among US high school students: Findings from the 2013 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey, JAMA Pediatrics, 169, 474, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3577 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Vreeman, 2007, A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying, Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 78, 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.78 · DOI
  26. Wolitzky-Taylor, 2008, Prevalence and correlates of dating violence in a national sample of adolescents, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 755
  27. Wolke, 2014, Bullying in elementary school and psychotic experiences at 18 years: A longitudinal, population-based cohort study, Psychological Medicine, 44, 2199, 10.1017/S0033291713002912 · DOI
  28. Yang, 2013, Different forms of bulling and victimization: Bully/victims versus bullies and victims, European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 723, 10.1080/17405629.2013.793596 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Zweig, 2013, The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1063, 10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ellyson, A. M., Adhia, A., Lyons, V. H., & Rivara, F. P.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Ellyson, Alice M.
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
122
Pages
105921
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119744321
Cited by
39
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • University of Washington
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
intimate partner violence, age of initiation, dating relationships, adolescents, young adults, prevalence, online abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review