Cited by 217Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Digital harassment and abuse: Experiences of sexuality and gender minority adults

Open access
Powell, Anastasia, Scott, Adrian J, Henry, Nicola·2020·European Journal of Criminology

Abstract

Digital harassment and abuse refers to a range of harmful, interpersonal behaviours experienced via the internet, as well as via mobile phone and other electronic communication devices. Whereas much existing research has focused on the experiences of children and young people (including foremost ‘cyberbullying’), there have been few international studies on adult experiences of digital harassment and abuse. As such, little is currently known about the extent, nature and impacts of digital harassment and abuse on adult victims. In particular, there exists a significant gap in current research into sexual, sexuality and gender based digital harassment and abuse. This article draws on findings from a larger research project in which we surveyed 2956 Australian adults and 2842 British adults (aged 18 to 54) about their experiences of technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV). The data presented here focus on the experiences of sexuality diverse adults ( n = 282) who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual or heterosexual, as well as gender diverse adults ( n = 90), including women, men and transgender individuals. Results suggest that transgender individuals experience higher rates of digital harassment and abuse overall, and higher rates of sexual, sexuality and gender based harassment and abuse, as compared with heterosexual cisgender individuals. Implications of the findings are discussed with respect to policy, prevention, and future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1477370818788006

Cites

70 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many TGD individuals have experienced cyberbullying due to a lack of societal acceptance of their gender minority status.

    “many TGD individuals have experienced cyberbullying due to a lack of societal acceptance of their gender minority status [2,3].”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Gender diverse adults and Table 5 passages report high rates of digital harassment among transgender participants, including offensive messages about their gender (60.0%). The paper does not establish that a lack of societal acceptance caused those experiences, and its findings concern transgender adults rather than all TGD individuals. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The vast majority of current research into cyberbullying is limited to predominantly adolescent populations.

    “the vast majority of current research into cyberbullying is limited to predominantly adolescent populations [2,3]”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction says much existing research focuses on cyberbullying experienced by children and young people, and the passage near Table 1 describes an overwhelming interest in youth experiences. It does not establish that the vast majority of research is limited to predominantly adolescent populations; it also notes studies of adults. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cyberbullying arising from gender-based discrimination is an external stressor, leading to vigilance and self-protective behavior, such as avoiding social media, and ultimately the potential internalization of these stressors as internalized transphobia and negative self-perception.

    “Specifically, cyberbullying arising from gender-based discrimination is an external stressor, leading to vigilance and self-protective behavior, such as avoiding social media, and ultimately the potential internalization of these stressors as internalized transphobia and negative self-perception [2,30].”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This also seemed to be internalized as negative emotions and self-perception in this sample, with frequent reports of avoidance of social media in response to cyberbullying and the internalization of shame and self-hatred expressed in several responses.

    “This also seemed to be internalized as negative emotions and self-perception in this sample, with frequent reports of avoidance of social media in response to cyberbullying and the internalization of shame and self-hatred expressed in several responses [2,30].”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Discussion and implications section (page unavailable) says digital harassment is likely to exacerbate emotional distress, supporting the general link to negative emotions. Our copy does not report frequent social-media avoidance or respondents expressing internalized shame or self-hatred; searches for those terms found no such findings. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals are significantly more likely to experience cyberbullying.

    “Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals are significantly more likely to experience cyberbullying.”

    From A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Discussion and implications reports that transgender adults had significantly higher victimisation than cisgender heterosexual participants for 8 of 26 digital harassment and abuse behaviours. This supports elevated risk for the transgender participants, but does not establish a significant difference in cyberbullying overall or for all transgender and gender diverse individuals. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, A., Scott, A. J., & Henry, N.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Powell, Anastasia
Venue
European Journal of Criminology
Published
2018-07-30
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
199-223
ISSN
  • 1477-3708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2609
OpenAlex
W2885907435
Cited by
217
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP130103094)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
online harassment, online abuse, technology-facilitated sexual violence, gender-diverse adults, transgender people, cyberbullying, adult victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review