Cited by 355Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingEducation for Peace and Conflict Resolution

The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: A systematic review

Evans, Caroline B.R., Fraser, Mark W., Cotter, Katie L.·2014·Aggression and Violent Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.004

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, C. B. R., Fraser, M. W., & Cotter, K. L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Evans, Caroline B.R.
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
532-544
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005679958
Cited by
355
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education for Peace and Conflict Resolution
Keywords
bullying prevention programs, school-based intervention, bullying perpetration, bullying victimization, bully-victims, intervention effectiveness, sample heterogeneity, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review