Cited by 123Analytical chemistry methods developmentAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of volatile aldehyde biomarkers in human blood by derivatization and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method by high performance liquid chromatography

Lili, Lv, Xu, Hui, Song, Dandan, Cui, Yanfang, Hu, Sheng, Zhang, Ganbing·2010·Journal of Chromatography A

Abstract

A new dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method (DLLME-SFO) was developed for the determination of volatile aldehyde biomarkers (hexanal and heptanal) in human blood samples. In the derivatization and extraction procedure, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) as derivatization reagent and formic acid as catalyzer were injected into the sample solution for derivatization with aldehydes, then the formed hydrazones was rapidly extracted by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with 1-dodecanol as extraction solvent. After centrifugation, the floated droplet was solidified in an ice bath and was easily removed for analysis. The effects of various experimental parameters on derivatization and extraction conditions were studied, such as the kind and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, the amount of derivatization reagent, derivatization temperature and time, extraction time and salt effect. The limit of detections (LODs) for hexanal and heptanal were 7.90 and 2.34nmolL(-1), respectively. Good reproducibility and recovery of the method were also obtained. The proposed method is an alternative approach to the quantification of volatile aldehyde biomarkers in complex biological samples, being more rapid and simpler and providing higher sensitivity compared with the traditional dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) methods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.081

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Otson, 1988, Sci. Total Environ., 77, 95, 10.1016/0048-9697(88)90049-6 · DOI
  2. Pillai, 2009, Anal. Chim. Acta, 632, 208, 10.1016/j.aca.2008.11.021 · DOI
  3. Stashenko, 2000, J. Chromatogr. A, 886, 175, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00479-9 · DOI
  4. St. Angelo, 1996, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 36, 175, 10.1080/10408399609527723 · DOI
  5. O’Brien, 2005, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 35, 609, 10.1080/10408440591002183 · DOI
  6. Kubatova, 2004, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 23, 2243, 10.1897/03-613 · DOI
  7. Reynolds, 2003, Environ. Health Perspect., 111, 663, 10.1289/ehp.5986 · DOI
  8. Deng, 2004, J. Chromatogr. B, 813, 47, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.09.007 · DOI
  9. Chi, 2007, Talanta, 72, 539, 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.11.018 · DOI
  10. Hang Ho, 2002, Anal. Chem., 74, 1232, 10.1021/ac015708q · DOI
  11. Saitoh, 2006, J. Chromatogr. A, 1134, 38, 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.002 · DOI
  12. Beránek, 2008, J. Chromatogr. A, 1209, 44, 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.013 · DOI
  13. Eugenia Bãnos, 2009, J. Chromatogr. A, 1216, 6554, 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.004 · DOI
  14. Svensson, 2007, J. Chromatogr. B, 860, 86, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.10.021 · DOI
  15. Gaspar, 2009, J. Chromatogr. A, 1216, 2749, 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.125 · DOI
  16. Andreoli, 2003, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 17, 637, 10.1002/rcm.960 · DOI
  17. Zhang, 2007, J. Chromatogr. A, 1160, 114, 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.015 · DOI
  18. Li, 2005, Anal. Biochem., 342, 318, 10.1016/j.ab.2005.04.024 · DOI
  19. Xue, 2008, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 22, 1181, 10.1002/rcm.3466 · DOI
  20. Zhang, 2006, Anal. Chim. Acta, 565, 129, 10.1016/j.aca.2006.02.050 · DOI
  21. Leeuwen, 2004, J. Chromatogr. A, 1058, 107, 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.149 · DOI
  22. Cancilla, 1992, J. Chromatogr., 627, 1, 10.1016/0021-9673(92)87181-7 · DOI
  23. Schmarr, 2008, Anal. Chim. Acta, 617, 119, 10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.002 · DOI
  24. Fiamegos, 2008, Anal. Chim. Acta, 609, 175, 10.1016/j.aca.2007.12.042 · DOI
  25. Stashenko, 2000, J. Chromatogr. A, 886, 175, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00479-9 · DOI
  26. Arthur, 1990, Anal. Chem., 62, 2145, 10.1021/ac00218a019 · DOI
  27. Wang, 2005, J. Chromatogr. A, 1071, 147, 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.09.031 · DOI
  28. Helena, 1999, Trends Anal. Chem., 18, 272, 10.1016/S0165-9936(98)00109-5 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Shin, 2009, J. Chromatogr. B, 877, 3707, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.09.022 · DOI
  30. Deng, 2004, J. Chromatogr. B, 808, 269, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.05.015 · DOI
  31. Deng, 2004, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 18, 1715, 10.1002/rcm.1544 · DOI
  32. Fiamegos, 2007, Anal. Chim. Acta, 599, 76, 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.068 · DOI
  33. Basheer, 2004, J. Chromatogr. A, 1022, 161, 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.09.043 · DOI
  34. Cruz-Vera, 2008, J. Chromatogr. A, 1202, 1, 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.06.035 · DOI
  35. Yang, 2007, J. Chromatogr. A, 1164, 56, 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.07.019 · DOI
  36. Cui, 2009, J. Chromatogr. A, 1216, 2241, 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.01.022 · DOI
  37. Chen, 2009, Anal. Chim. Acta, 632, 80, 10.1016/j.aca.2008.10.068 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Xiong, 2009, J. Pharma. Biomed. Anal., 49, 572, 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.11.036 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Moinfar, 2009, J. Hazard. Mater., 69, 907, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.030 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Leong, 2008, J. Chromatogr. A, 1211, 8, 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.111 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Xu, 2009, Anal. Chim. Acta, 636, 28, 10.1016/j.aca.2009.01.028 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–113 of 113

Metadata

Authors
Lili, L., Xu, H., Song, D., Cui, Y., Hu, S., & Zhang, G.
Affiliations
  • Central China Normal University (CN)
  • Hubei Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Hubei University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Hui
  • Zhang, Ganbing
Venue
Journal of Chromatography A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
1217
Issue
16
Pages
2365-2370
ISSN
0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093027155
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
18.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
hexanal, heptanal, human blood, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, solidification of floating organic droplet, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivatization, hydrazones, derivatization optimization, oxidative stress biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aldehydes, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Chemical Fractionation, Humans, Dodecanol, Phenylhydrazines, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sodium Chloride, Solvents, Time, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models, Volatile Organic Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review