Cited by 565Analytical chemistry methods developmentAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Solid-phase microextraction

Prosen, Helena, Zupančič-Kralj, Lucija·1999·TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-9936(98)00109-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prosen, H., & Zupančič-Kralj, L.
Affiliations
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Prosen, Helena
Venue
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
272-282
ISSN
0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053589876
Cited by
565
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 34
FWCI
21.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
solid-phase microextraction, sample preparation, solvent reduction, extraction conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review