Cited by 14Herpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsAnimal Virus Infections StudiesViral-associated cancers and disorders

Replication of neurovirulent equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) in CD172a(+) monocytic cells.

Laval, Kathlyn, Van Cleemput, Jolien, Poelaert, Katrien C., Brown, Ivy K., Nauwynck, Hans J.·2017·Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) is responsible for respiratory disorders, abortion and myeloencephalopathy (EHM) in horses. Two pathotypes of EHV-1 strains are circulating in the field: neurovirulent (N) and non-neurovirulent (NN). For both strains, CD172a+ monocytic cells are one of the main carrier cells of EHV-1 during primary infection, allowing the virus to invade the horse's body. Recently, we showed that EHV-1 NN strains showed a restricted and delayed replication in CD172a+ cells. Here we characterize the in vitro replication kinetics of two EHV-1N strains in CD172a+ cells and investigate if the replication of these strains is similarly silenced as shown for EHV-1 NN strains. We found that EHV-1N replication was restricted to 7-8% in CD172a+ cells compared to 100% in control RK-13 cells. EHV-1N replication was not delayed in CD172a+ cells but virus production was significant lower (10 3.0 TCID 50/10 5 inoculated cells) than in RK-13 cells (10 8.5 TCID 50/10 5 inoculated cells). Approximately 0.04% of CD172a+ cells produced and transmitted infectious EHV-1 to neighbour cells compared to 65% of RK-13 cells. Unlike what we observed for the NN strain, pretreatment of CD172a+ cells with histone deacetylases inhibitors (HDACi) did not influence the replication of EHV-1N strains in these cells. Overall, these results show that the EHV-1 replication of N strains in CD172a+ cells differs from that observed for NN strains, which may contribute to their different pathogeneses in vivo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cimid.2016.11.006

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laval, K., Van Cleemput, J., Poelaert, K. C., Brown, I. K., & Nauwynck, H. J.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Nauwynck, Hans J.
Venue
Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
50
Pages
58-62
ISSN
0147-9571 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2555142972
Cited by
14
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Belgian Science Policy (BELSPO)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
Keywords
equine herpesvirus 1, viral replication kinetics, myeloencephalopathy, histone deacetylase inhibitors, cell-to-cell transmission, RK13 cells, horses, viral pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Herpesvirus 1, Equid, Horses, Monocytes, Virus Replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review