CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18University-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesRegional Development and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The development of Innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: An institutional work approach

Gonçalves, Leonardo, Faccin, Kadigia, Garay, Jerusa, Zarpelon, Felipe, Balestrin, Alsones·2024·Cities
DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104747
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104747

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Adner, 2006, Match your innovation strategy to your innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem, Harvard Business Review, 84, 98
  2. Aldrich, 1994, Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation, Academy of Management Review, 19, 645, 10.2307/258740 · DOI
  3. Almpanopoulou, A., Ritala, P., & Blomqvist, K. (2019). Innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem emergence barriers: Institutional perspective. · DOI
  4. Alvarez, 2015, Opportunities and institutions: A co-creation story of the king crab industry, Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 95, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.011 · DOI
  5. Audretsch, 2021, Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: The role of institutions, PLoS One, 10.1371/journal.pone.0247609 · DOI
  6. Broccardo, 2019, Smart city governance: Exploring the institutional work of multiple actors towards collaboration, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10.1108/IJPSM-05-2018-0126 · DOI
  7. Connor, 2004, Time to scale up cooperation? Trade unions, NGOs, and the international anti-sweatshop movement, Development in Practice, 14, 61, 10.1080/0961452032000170631 · DOI
  8. Dolbec, 2015, Refashioning a field? Connected consumers and institutional dynamics in markets, Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1447, 10.1086/680671 · DOI
  9. Dover, 2010, A gap year for institutional theory: Integrating the study of institutional work and participatory action research, Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 305, 10.1177/1056492610371496 · DOI
  10. Engel, 2015, Global clusters of innovation: Lessons from Silicon Valley, California Management Review, 57, 36, 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.36 · DOI
  11. Etgar, 2008, A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 97, 10.1007/s11747-007-0061-1 · DOI
  12. Etzkowitz, 2000, The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “mode 2” to a triple Helix of university–industry–government relations, Research Policy, 29, 109, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 · DOI
  13. Feldman, 1999, Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition, European Economic Review, 43, 409, 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6 · DOI
  14. Franz, 2017, Urban governance and economic development in Medellín: An “urban miracle”?, Latin American Perspectives, 44, 52, 10.1177/0094582X16668313 · DOI
  15. Lawrence, 2011, Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization, Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52, 10.1177/1056492610387222 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Luvizotto, C. K. (2009). Cultura gaúcha e separatismo no Rio Grande do Sul. · DOI
  17. Olsen, 1997, Buyer-supplier relationships: Alternative research approaches, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3, 221, 10.1016/S0969-7012(97)00022-1 · DOI
  18. Phillips, 2000, Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields, Journal of Management Studies, 37, 10.1111/1467-6486.00171 · DOI
  19. Pique, 2019, Areas of innovation in cities: The evolution of 22@ Barcelona, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 10, 3, 10.1504/IJKBD.2019.098227 · DOI
  20. Reinecke, 2022, The role of temporality in institutional stabilization: A process view, Academy of Management Review
  21. Ritala, 2018, Q&A. Innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Where are we now and how do we move forward?, Technology Innovation Management Review, 8, 10.22215/timreview/1171 · DOI
  22. Siltaloppi, 2016, Institutional complexity as a driver for innovation in service ecosystems, Service Science, 8, 333, 10.1287/serv.2016.0151 · DOI
  23. Spigel, 2017, The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 49, 10.1111/etap.12167 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Styhre, 2014, Gender equality as institutional work: The case of the Church of Sweden, Gender, Work and Organization, 21, 105, 10.1111/gwao.12024 · DOI
  25. Szerb, 2019, The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: The moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem, Regional Studies, 53, 1308, 10.1080/00343404.2018.1510481 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Thomas, L. D., & Autio, E. (2014, January). The fifth facet: The ecosystem as an organizational field. In DRUID society conference (pp. 16–18). · DOI
  27. Vangen, 2003, Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 5, 10.1177/0021886303039001001 · DOI
  28. Willems, 2022, Understanding the institutional work of boundary objects in climate-proofing cities: The case of Amsterdam rainproof, Urban Climate, 44, 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101222 · DOI
  29. Willmott, 2011, “Institutional work” for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory, Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 67, 10.1177/1056492610387224 · DOI
  30. Zilber, 2002, Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234, 10.2307/3069294 · DOI
  31. Zvolska, 2019, How do sharing organisations create and disrupt institutions? Towards a framework for institutional work in the sharing economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 667, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.057 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Gonçalves, L., Faccin, K., Garay, J., Zarpelon, F., & Balestrin, A.
Affiliations
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR)
Corresponding author
Gonçalves, Leonardo
ORCID
Venue
Cities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
146
Pages
104747
ISSN
0264-2751 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cities.2023.104747
OpenAlex
W4390598006
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Cities (publishedVersion)
Funders
CNPq
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Development › Regional Development and Innovation
Keywords
innovation ecosystems, entrepreneurial ecosystems, institutional work, urban innovation, Porto Alegre, Florianópolis, Latin American cities, leadership roles, community role, ecosystem emergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review