The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK
Open accessAbstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) has unique advantages in the rapid prototyping of thermoplastics which have been developed in diverse fields. However, although great efforts have been made to optimize FDM process, the mechanical properties of printed parts are limited by the weak interlamination bonding as well as the poor performance of raw filaments used, such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA). Adding fibers into thermoplastic matrix and preparing high-performance filaments have been indicated to enhance the properties of fabricated parts. Recently, heat-resistant polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and its fiber reinforced composites were proposed for FDM process due to overcoming the limitation of equipment and process. However, few researches have been reported on the effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced PEEK composites. Therefore, 5wt% carbon fiber (CF) and glass fiber (GF) reinforced PEEK composite filaments were prepared respectively in this study. The effects of various printing parameters including nozzle temperature, platform temperature, printing speed and layer thickness on the mechanical properties (including tensile strength, flexural strength and impact strength) were surveyed. To analyze the microstructure and failure reasons of printed CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK samples, the tensile fractured surfaces were investigated via scanning electron microscope (SEM).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: A review
Xie, Y., Hill, C. A. S., Xiao, Z., Militz, H., & Mai, C. (2010) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.005 · Cited by 2,244
Ning, F., Cong, W., Qiu, J., Wei, J., & Wang, S. (2015) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 · Cited by 1,718
Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing
Tekinalp, H. L., Kunc, V., Velez-Garcia, G. M., Duty, C. E., Love, L. J., Naskar, A. K., Blue, C. A., & Ozcan, S. (2014) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 · Cited by 1,514
A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites
Parandoush, P., & Lin, D. (2017) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 · Cited by 1,270
FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R. (2018) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 · Cited by 1,015
Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene
Carneiro, O. S., Silva, A. F., & Gomes, R. (2015) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053 · Cited by 851
Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: A review
Brenken, B., Barocio, E., Favaloro, A., Kunc, V., & Pipes, R. B. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002 · Cited by 737
Short fiber reinforced composites for fused deposition modeling
Zhong, W., Li, F., Zhang, Z., Song, L., & Li, Z. (2001) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(00)01810-4 · Cited by 721
Yang, C., Tian, X., Li, D., Cao, Y., Zhao, F., & Shi, C. (2017) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 · Cited by 662
Cited by
Polymer 3D Printing Review: Materials, Process, and Design Strategies for Medical Applications
Arefin, A. M. E., Khatri, N. R., Kulkarni, N., & Egan, P. F. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13091499 · Cited by 361
Wang, P., Zou, B., Ding, S., Huang, C., Shi, Z., Ma, Y., & Yao, P. (2020) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108175 · Cited by 357
Self-citationFused filament fabrication of peek: A review of process-structure-property relationships
Zanjanijam, A. R., Major, I., Lyons, J. G., Lafont, U., & Devine, D. M. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12081665 · Cited by 240
Valvez, S., Silva, A. P., & Reis, P. N. B. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14132564 · Cited by 195
Yang, D., Cao, Y., Zhang, Z., Yin, Y., & Li, D. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107149 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- WANG, P., ZOU, B., DING, S., LI, L., & HUANG, C.
- Venue
- Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 236-246
- ISSN
- 1000-9361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035576222
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 14.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040
- The paper
- WANG, P., ZOU, B., DING, S., LI, L., & HUANG, C. (2021). Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
