Cited by 92Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Panels and syndromic testing in clinical microbiology

Open access
Dien Bard, Jennifer, McElvania, Erin·2020·Clinics in Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Syndromic panels have allowed clinical microbiology laboratories to rapidly identify bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites and are now fully integrated into the standard testing practices of many clinical laboratories. To maximize the benefit of syndromic testing, laboratories must implement strict measures to ensure that syndromic panels are being used responsibly. This article discusses commercially available syndromic panels, the benefits and limitations of testing, and how diagnostic and laboratory stewardship can be used to optimize testing and improve patient care while keeping costs at a minimum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cll.2020.08.001

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detection of human herpesvirus-6 may reflect chromosomally integrated viral DNA rather than active infection, particularly in immunocompetent individuals.

    “For example, the detection of human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) may reflect chromosomally integrated viral DNA rather than active infection, particularly in immunocompetent individuals.”

    From Utility and clinical relevance of multiplex PCR panels for diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Meningitis/encephalitis syndromic panel section (page not provided) says HHV-6 detection may represent chromosomally integrated virus rather than true infection. It does not say this explanation is particularly likely in immunocompetent individuals; it notes that most patients with reported HHV-6 central nervous system infections in one pediatric study were immunocompetent. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Central nervous system infections such as meningitis and encephalitis pose significant diagnostic challenges because of overlap in their clinical presentations.

    “Central nervous system (CNS) infections such as meningitis and encephalitis pose significant diagnostic challenges because of overlap in their clinical presentations.1”

    From Utility and clinical relevance of multiplex PCR panels for diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Meningitis/encephalitis syndromic panel section describes CNS infections as having many infectious causes and says improved diagnostics are needed because conventional methods have shortcomings. It does not attribute the diagnostic challenge to overlapping clinical presentations of meningitis and encephalitis. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Epstein-Barr virus positivity in cerebrospinal fluid may indicate latent infection without central nervous system involvement.

    “Similarly, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity in CSF may indicate latent infection without CNS involvement.1,5,6”

    From Utility and clinical relevance of multiplex PCR panels for diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Meningitis/encephalitis syndromic panel section discusses whether a positive HHV-6 result reflects a true CNS infection, but it does not make this point about Epstein–Barr virus. Searches for EBV positivity, latency, and CSF returned no passage addressing the claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dien Bard, J., & McElvania, E.
Affiliations
Endeavor Health (US)
Venue
Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
393-420
ISSN
0272-2712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089712858
Cited by
92
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinics in Laboratory Medicine (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
BD
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
multiplex PCR, clinical microbiology testing, laboratory stewardship, antimicrobial stewardship, diagnostic stewardship, pathogen identification, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Humans, Infections, Microbiological Techniques, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review