Cited by 20Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingAntibiotic Use and Resistance

Effective approaches to diagnostic stewardship of syndromic molecular panels

Open access
Hitchcock, Matthew M, Gomez, Carlos A, Pozdol, Joseph, Banaei, Niaz·2024·The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Background: Syndromic molecular panels for the diagnosis of gastroenteritis, meningitis/encephalitis, and pneumonia are becoming routinely used for patient care throughout the world. Content: These rapid, sample-to-answer assays have great potential to improve patient care, infection control, and antimicrobial stewardship. However, diagnostic stewardship is essential for their optimal use and accuracy, and interventions can be applied at all phases of the diagnostic process. Summary: The aim of this review article is to describe effective approaches to diagnostic stewardship for syndromic molecular panels to ensure appropriate test utilization and quality assured results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jalm/jfad063

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiplex PCR panels allow simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens directly from cerebrospinal fluid samples, offering rapid results with high analytical sensitivity and specificity.

    “These panels allow simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens directly from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples, offering rapid results with high analytical sensitivity and specificity.2”

    From Utility and clinical relevance of multiplex PCR panels for diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel section says the FilmArray panel detects 14 pathogens from CSF in under an hour and reports mean sensitivity of 92.1% and specificity of 99.2%. Those figures support the claim of rapid detection with high sensitivity and specificity, but the passage reports diagnostic test accuracy, not specifically analytical sensitivity and specificity. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence on FAME is still confined to observational, usually retrospective, and single-center studies.

    “Evidence is still confined to observational, usually retrospective, and single-center studies (9).”

    From Optimized use of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel for early discontinuation of antibiotic therapy (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel section discusses FAMEP findings and cites a meta-analysis, but does not characterize the underlying studies as observational, retrospective, or single-center. Searches for those study-design terms and for limitations of FAMEP evidence found no passage establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hitchcock, M. M., Gomez, C. A., Pozdol, J., & Banaei, N.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha, NE , United States
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Banaei, Niaz
Venue
The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Published
2024-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
104-115
ISSN
2475-7241 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390547457
Cited by
20
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI052073, T32AI007502)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
diagnostic stewardship, rapid molecular diagnostics, antimicrobial stewardship, infection control, test utilization, diagnostic accuracy, gastroenteritis, pneumonia
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, Gastroenteritis, Humans, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review