Cited by 41Bacterial Infections and VaccinesInfectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Comparison of antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the implementation of an on-site FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in an academic tertiary pediatric hospital: a retrospective observational study

Open access
Hagen, Alexandra, Eichinger, Anna, Meyer-Buehn, Melanie, Schober, Tilmann, Huebner, Johannes·2020·BMC Pediatrics

Abstract

Background: Prompt initiation of empiric therapy is common practice in case of suspected meningitis or encephalitis. However, in children the most common pathogens are viruses that usually do not require and are not covered by the applied anti-infective treatment. Novel multiplex PCR (mPCR) panels provide rapid on-site diagnostic testing for a variety of pathogens. This study compared empiric antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the introduction of an on-site FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (FA ME Panel). Methods: We retrospectively compared data for empiric antibiotic and acyclovir usage between pediatric patients with suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection receiving mPCR testing and a matched historical control group. Patients were matched by age and suspected CNS infection. We included all patients for whom empiric antibiotics and/or acyclovir were prescribed. Results: Each study group consisted of 46 patients with 29 (63.0%) infants and 17 (37.0%) older children. A viral pathogen was diagnosed in 5/46 (10.9%) patients in the control group (all enteroviruses) and in 14/46 (30.4%) patients in the mPCR group (enterovirus n = 9; human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) n = 5), (p = 0.038)). Length of Therapy (LoT) and Days of Therapy (DoT) for antibiotics were significantly lower for infants (4.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.038 and 8.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.015, respectively). Acyclovir therapy was significantly shorter for both, infants and older children (3.0 vs. 1.0 day, p < 0.001 for both age groups). Conclusion: The findings of our study suggest that the introduction of a FA ME Panel into clinical routine procedures is associated with a significantly reduced LoT and DoT of empiric anti-infective treatment in children with suspected meningoencephalitis. The largest effect was observed in infants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12887-020-1944-2

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Bosk A, Groll A, Hufnagel M, Lehrnbecher T, Pöschl J, Simon A, et al AWMF-Leitlinie: Sepsis bei Kindern jenseits der Neonatalperiode. 1st edition 2015. Available at: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/024-025.html (accessed 17 Jan 2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagen, A., Eichinger, A., Meyer-Buehn, M., Schober, T., & Huebner, J.
Affiliations
LMU Klinikum (DE)
Venue
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2020-02-05
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
56-56
ISSN
1471-2431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004655768
Cited by
41
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
meningitis, encephalitis, empirical antibiotic therapy, acyclovir, FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel, multiplex PCR, on-site pathogen detection, central nervous system infection, viral meningitis, enterovirus, human herpesvirus 6, infants, antibiotic duration, antimicrobial stewardship
MeSH terms
Acyclovir, Adolescent, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Child, Preschool, Encephalitis, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Infant, Male, Meningitis, Retrospective Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review