Cited by 40Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesDysphagia Assessment and Management

A review of nutrition screening tools used to assess the malnutrition-sarcopenia syndrome (MSS) in the older adult

Juby, Angela G., Mager, Diana R.·2019·Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Abstract

Background Malnutrition and sarcopenia are common in older adults. A new clinical syndrome has been suggested - the Malnutrition Sarcopenia Syndrome (MSS) - that may provide improved management, by highlighting two older adult conditions that can interact in a cumulative way to affect functional independence and health outcomes. This paper evaluates the published literature reporting data on both nutrition and sarcopenia evaluation simultaneously in the population studied, and creates a diagnostic algorithm. Methods An inclusive, systematic literature search was done for articles including a simultaneous standardised evaluation of sarcopenia and nutritional status, from 1990-date. Sarcopenic status needed to be evaluated using accepted guidelines published by international guideline committees which include a functional muscle evaluation and a quantitative evaluation using bioimpedence assay or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Nutritional status needed to evaluated with a standardised, validated nutritional screening tool that was not disease specific. Results 11 studies met these criteria. They differed in their methodology for screening both sarcopenia and nutritional issues. They differed as to the population studied (community versus institutionalised versus hospitalised). Conclusions No one methodology was consistent for evaluation of sarcopenia or malnutrition. The concept of the Malnutrition Sarcopenia Syndrome intuitively makes sense to clinicians. This opinion paper suggests a possible clinical approach. The management and interventions for both conditions are likely to have considerable overlap. There needs to be some consensus on how to evaluate it, in order to be able to accurately interpret the impact of interventions that may be undertaken for one or both conditions simultaneously.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.04.003

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although MSS has not yet been widely evaluated in health settings, its potential value for predicting poor outcomes in clinical practices has been illustrated in several studies.

    “Although MSS has not yet been widely evaluated in health settings, its potential value for predicting poor outcomes in clinical practices has been illustrated in several studies (53, 54).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juby, A. G., & Mager, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Juby, Angela G.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
32
Pages
8-15
ISSN
2405-4577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2939704173
Cited by
40
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-04-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition ESPEN (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
sarcopenia, malnutrition, older adults, nutrition screening tools, nutritional assessment, diagnostic algorithm, bioimpedance, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, functional independence
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Nutritional Status, Syndrome, Nutrition Assessment, Frail Elderly, Malnutrition, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review