Cited by 1,049Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis – Clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters

Norman, Kristina, Stobäus, Nicole, Pirlich, Matthias, Bosy-Westphal, Anja·2012·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims The use of phase angle (PhA) and raw parameters of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has gained attention as alternative to conventional error-prone calculation of body composition in disease. This review investigates the clinical relevance and applicability of PhA and Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) which uses the plot of resistance and reactance normalized per height. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Medline identifying studies relevant to this review until March 2011. We included studies on the use of PhA or BIVA derived from tetrapolar BIA in out- and in-patient settings or institutionalized elderly. Results Numerous studies have proven the prognostic impact of PhA regarding mortality or postoperative complications in different clinical settings. BIVA has been shown to provide information about hydration and body cell mass and therefore allows assessment of patients in whom calculation of body composition fails due to altered hydration. Reference values exist for PhA and BIVA facilitating interpretation of data. Conclusion PhA, a superior prognostic marker, should be considered as a screening tool for the identification of risk patients with impaired nutritional and functional status, BIVA is recommended for further nutritional assessment and monitoring, in particular when calculation of body composition is not feasible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norman, K., Stobäus, N., Pirlich, M., & Bosy-Westphal, A.
Affiliations
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge (DE)
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
854-861
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032959495
Cited by
1,049
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 117 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, body composition, hydration status, body cell mass, nutritional assessment, prognostic factors, mortality, postoperative complications, institutionalized elderly, reference values, nutritional screening
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Body Water, Humans, Nutritional Status, Prognosis, Reference Values, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review