Cited by 67Body Composition Measurement TechniquesDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Combined evaluation of nutrition and hydration in dialysis patients with bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA)

Piccoli, Antonio, Codognotto, Marta, Piasentin, Paola, Naso, Agostino·2014·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims Body hydration changes continuously in hemodialysis patients. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is used for the nutritional evaluation but it does not allow a direct evaluation of hydration. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) is very sensitive to hydration. The potential of the combined evaluation of hydration and nutrition with SGA and BIVA is still lacking.Methods Observational cross-sectional study on 130 (94 Male) uremic patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis three times a week. Nutritional status was evaluated with the SGA. Each subject was classified as SGA-A (normal nutritional status), SGA-B (moderate malnutrition), or SGA-C (severe malnutrition). Body hydration was evaluated with BIVA. The two vector components resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) were normalized by the subject's height and standardized as bivariate Z-score, i.e. Z(R) and Z(Xc).Results Undernutrition influenced impedance vector distribution both before and after a dialysis session. In pre-dialysis, the mean vector of SGA A was inside the 50% tolerance ellipse. In SGA B and C, Z(R) was increased and Z(Xc) decreased, indicating a progressive loss of soft tissue mass. Fluid removal with dialysis increased both Z(R) and Z(Xc) in SGA A and B but not in C. With ROC curve analysis on the slope of increase, we found the cutoff value of 27.8° below which undernutrition was present, either moderate or severe. The area under the ROC curve was 77.7° (95% CI 69.5-84.5, P < .0001) with sensitivity 75.9%, specificity 78.6%, positive predicted value 74.6%, and negative predicted value 79%.Conclusions The distribution of impedance vectors is associated with the SGA classification of patients. The change in body hydration in each SGA category can be detected with BIVA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.08.007

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piccoli, A., Codognotto, M., Piasentin, P., & Naso, A.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Piccoli, Antonio
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
673-677
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023847552
Cited by
67
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, hemodialysis, nutritional status, body hydration, malnutrition, Subjective Global Assessment, uremic patients, fluid removal, soft tissue mass
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Water, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Nutrition Assessment, Electric Impedance, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review