Cited by 28Diet and metabolism studiesBariatric Surgery and OutcomesDietary Effects on Health

Resistance training during a 12-week protein supplemented VLCD treatment enhances weight-loss outcomes in obese patients

Jo, Edward, Worts, Phillip R., Elam, Marcus L., Brown, Ann Frost, Khamoui, Andy V., Kim, Do-Houn, Yeh, Ming-Chia, Ormsbee, Michael J. +4 more·2019·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background This investigation evaluated the efficacy by which resistance training enhances body composition, metabolic, and functional outcomes for obese patients undergoing a 12-week medically supervised hypocaloric treatment. Methods This was a single-blind, randomized, parallel-group prospective trial. Morbidly obese patients were prescribed a 12-week proprietary very low calorie diet (VLCD) treatment (Optifast®) with supplemental protein (1120 kcals/day) and were placed in one of two groups for 14 weeks: 1) Standard Treatment Control (CON) (n = 5) or 2) Resistance Training (RT) (n = 6). Both groups underwent a pedometer-based walking program; however only RT performed resistance training 3 days/week for 12 weeks. Body composition, resting energy expenditure (REE), neuromuscular function, and serum biomarkers were measured at weeks 0, 6, and 13. Results Both groups exhibited a significant loss of total body mass (TBM) (CON: -19.4 ± 2.3 kg, p = 0.0009 vs. RT: -15.8 ± 1.5 kg, p = 0.0002) and fat mass (FM) (CON: -14.7 ± 1.8 kg, p = 0.0002 vs. RT: -15.1 ± 2.1 kg, p = 0.0002) with no group differences. CON lost 4.6 ± 0.8 kg (p = 0.004) of lean mass (LM) while RT demonstrated no changes. Group differences were found for the relative proportion of total weight-loss due to FM-loss (CON: 75.6 ± 3.4% vs. RT: 96.0 ± 6.0%, p = 0.03) and LM-loss (CON: 24.4 ± 3.2% vs. RT: 4.0 ± 6.5%, p = 0.03). CON demonstrated a 328.6 ± 72.7 kcal/day (-14.3 ± 2.4%) (p = 0.02) decrease in REE while RT exhibited a non-significant decrease of 4.6 ± 1.6% (p = 0.78). RT demonstrated greater improvements in all measures of contractile function and strength when compared to CON (p < 0.05). At post-treatment, RT exhibited greater serum free fatty acids (p = 0.01), glycerol (p = 0.003), and β-hydroxybutyrate (p = 0.005) than CON. Conclusion Resistance training was advantageous for weight-loss composition by preservation of LM without compromising overall weight- or fat-loss in morbidly obese men and women undergoing a protein supplemented VLCD. These changes accompanied positive adaptations for resting metabolism and muscular function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.12.015

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exercise combined with a weight loss program provides only modest outcomes for offsetting lean body mass loss, likely due to modest caloric expenditure with moderate exercise.

    “In an effort to offset this LBM loss, several studies have incorporated exercise in conjunction with a weight loss program; however, this has only provided modest outcomes, most likely due to the modest caloric expenditure experienced with moderate exercise [7].”
  • A recent study using a popular very low-calorie diet system supplemented with whey protein described a total body weight loss of 17 kg, of which 4.6 kg was lean body mass (approximately 25% of weight lost), after twelve weeks of a 1120 kcal/day, high protein, low-fat diet.

    “A recent study using a popular VLCD system (Optifast®, Nestlé HealthCare Nutrition, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) supplemented with whey protein described a total body weight loss of 17 kg, of which 4.6 kg was LBM (approximately 25% of the weight lost), after twelve weeks of following this 1120 kcal/day, high protein, low-fat diet [7].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jo, E., Worts, P. R., Elam, M. L., Brown, A. F., Khamoui, A. V., Kim, D.-H., Yeh, M.-C., Ormsbee, M. J., Prado, C. M., Cain, A., Snyder, K., & Kim, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • California State Polytechnic University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Tallahassee Memorial HealthCare (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jeong-Su
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
372-382
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2781276735
Cited by
28
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Strength and Conditioning Association Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
resistance training, very low calorie diet, obesity, weight loss, protein supplementation, body composition, fat loss, lean body mass, resting energy expenditure, neuromuscular function, muscle strength, free fatty acids, glycerol, serum biomarkers, hypocaloric diet, contractile function, functional capacity
MeSH terms
Diet, Reducing, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Prospective Studies, Therapeutics, Weight Loss, Single-Blind Method, Dietary Supplements, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review