Cited by 92Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Supplemental parenteral nutrition improves immunity with unchanged carbohydrate and protein metabolism in critically ill patients: The SPN2 randomized tracer study

Open access
Berger, Mette M., Pantet, Olivier, Jacquelin-Ravel, Nathalie, Charrière, Mélanie, Schmidt, Sabine, Becce, Fabio, Audran, Régine, Spertini, François +2 more·2019·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims Individualized supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) providing measured energy expenditure from day 4 reduced infectious complications in a previous study including 305 intensive care (ICU) patients. The study aimed at investigating the metabolic, and immune responses underlying the clinical response of the previous trial.Methods Randomized controlled trial enrolling 23 critically ill patients on day 3 (D3) of admission to the ICU who were fed less than 60% of their energy target by the enteral nutrition (EN) alone: allocation to either continued EN or to SPN to a target validated by indirect calorimetry. Protein and glucose metabolism (primary endpoint) were investigated with tracer isotopes on D4 and D9. Secondary endpoints: 1) immune response, investigated in serum and in stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBC), by dosing a panel of cytokines (infectious complications were recorded), and 2) Muscle mass was assessed by ultrasound of the thigh.Results Comparable at baseline, the SPN group (n = 11) received more energy (median 24.3 versus 17.8 kcal/kg/day: p < 0.001) and proteins (1.11 versus 0.69 g/kg/day: p < 0.001) than the control group during the five days' intervention, resulting in a less negative energy balance by D9 (p = 0.0027). Net protein breakdown and Glucose kinetics on D9 did not differ, within or between groups. In agreement with a decrease in infection rate, immune response in the SPN group showed decreased serum IL-6 (p = 0.024), IL-1β, IL-10 levels and TNF-α secretion by PBMC (p = 0.018) at D9. Muscle mass loss from D4 to D15 tended to be less in the SPN group (-16% versus -23%: p = 0.06). Clinical course by D28 did not differ.Conclusions Feeding patients to cover an individualised measured energy target with SPN from D4 to cover needs, was associated with improved immunity, less systemic inflammation and a trend to less muscle mass loss.Clinical trial registry NCT02022813 at https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.10.023

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The exclusion of some randomized studies guided by IC, including two trials showing reduction of infectious complications, was by design because they did not compare IC-guided strategy with equations.

    “Fifth, another limitation is the non-conclusion of some randomized studies guided by IC, including two randomized trials showing a reduction of infectious complications in the patients receiving the energy determined by REE [5, 6]. This exclusion was by design as the two studies did not compare IC-guided strategy with equations.”
  • Further RCTs using IC as an energy target showed significant reduction in nosocomial infections and improved immunity or less systemic inflammation.

    “Results from further RCTs using IC as a energy target showed significant reduction in nosocomial infections [9] and improved immunity or less systemic inflammation [5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, M. M., Pantet, O., Jacquelin-Ravel, N., Charrière, M., Schmidt, S., Becce, F., Audran, R., Spertini, F., Tappy, L., & Pichard, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Berger, Mette M.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
2408-2416
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900303624
Cited by
92
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7
Type
supplementary materials
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Université de Lausanne
  • Novartis
  • Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
supplemental parenteral nutrition, critically ill patients, intensive care unit, energy metabolism, protein metabolism, glucose kinetics, immune response, systemic inflammation, cytokines, interleukin-6, muscle mass loss, enteral nutrition, energy balance, infectious complications
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Cross Infection, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Immunity, Male, Middle Aged, Parenteral Nutrition, Cytokines, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review