Cited by 264Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityDigital Transformation in LawE-Government and Public Services

E-residency and blockchain

Open access
Sullivan, Clare, Burger, Eric·2017·Computer Law & Security Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Estonian project provides identity authentication also to non-Estonians and even an own cryptocurrency Estcoin, relying on blockchain.

    “Some of the aspects of this encounter emerge from the Estonian project of providing identity authentication also to non-Estonians, and even an own cryptocurrency Estcoin, rely-ing on blockchain [36].”

    From Tribal Governance: The Business of Blockchain Authentication (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

  • The Estonian e-residency initiative raises concerns regarding identity authentication and the possible consequences of displacing responsibilities.

    “The Estonian e-residency initiative [36] raises concerns regarding identity authentication and the possible consequences of displacing responsibilities.”

    From Tribal Governance: The Business of Blockchain Authentication (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan, C., & Burger, E.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Clare
Venue
Computer Law & Security Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
470-481
ISSN
2212-473X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2327198637
Cited by
264
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 2
FWCI
48.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computer law & security review (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Army Research Office (W911NF-15-1-0595)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
Keywords
e-residency, blockchain, digital identity, Estonia, identity verification, digital citizenship, digital borders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review