The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objectives COVID-19 has been arguably the most important public health concern worldwide in 2020, and efforts are now escalating to suppress or eliminate its spread. In this study we undertook a meta-analysis to estimate the global and regional seroprevalence rates in humans of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and to assess whether seroprevalence is associated with geographical, climatic and/or sociodemographic factors. Methods We systematically reviewed PubMed, Scopus, Embase, medRxiv and bioRxiv databases for preprints or peer-reviewed articles (up to 14 August 2020). Study eligibility criteria were population-based studies describing the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 (IgG and/or IgM) serum antibodies. Participants were people from different socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds (from the general population), whose prior COVID-19 status was unknown and who were tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum antibodies. We used a random-effects model to estimate pooled seroprevalence, and then extrapolated the findings to the global population (for 2020). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses explored potential sources of heterogeneity in the data, and relationships between seroprevalence and sociodemographic, geographical and/or climatic factors. Results In total, 47 studies involving 399 265 people from 23 countries met the inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity (I2 = 99.4%, p < 0.001) was seen among studies; SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in the general population varied from 0.37% to 22.1%, with a pooled estimate of 3.38% (95%CI 3.05–3.72%; 15 879/399 265). On a regional level, seroprevalence varied from 1.45% (0.95–1.94%, South America) to 5.27% (3.97–6.57%, Northern Europe), although some variation appeared to relate to the serological assay used. The findings suggested an association of seroprevalence with income levels, human development indices, geographic latitudes and/or climate. Extrapolating to the 2020 world population, we estimated that 263.5 million individuals had been exposed or infected at the time of this study. Conclusions This study showed that SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence varied markedly among geographic regions, as might be expected early in a pandemic. Longitudinal surveys to continually monitor seroprevalence around the globe will be critical to support prevention and control efforts, and might indicate levels of endemic stability or instability in particular countries and regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5 · Cited by 48,884
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019
Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001017 · Cited by 28,244
Ai, T., Yang, Z., Hou, H., Zhan, C., Chen, C., Lv, W., Tao, Q., Sun, Z., & Xia, L. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200642 · Cited by 5,685
Chu, D. K., Akl, E. A., Duda, S., Solo, K., Yaacoub, S., Schünemann, H. J., Chu, D. K., Akl, E. A., El-harakeh, A., Bognanni, A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31142-9 · Cited by 3,843 · cited 1×
“A global metaanalysis [74] showed that applying physical distancing of 1 m and usage of personal protective equipment (PPE, including face mask, eye and body protection) results in a major reduction in transmission/infection risk.”
BackgroundHow will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?
Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30567-5 · Cited by 3,648
Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis
Veroniki, A. A., Jackson, D., Viechtbauer, W., Bender, R., Bowden, J., Knapp, G., Kuss, O., Higgins, J. P., Langan, D., & Salanti, G. (2016) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1164 · Cited by 1,685
Influenza Virus Transmission Is Dependent on Relative Humidity and Temperature
Lowen, A. C., Mubareka, S., Steel, J., & Palese, P. (2007) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0030151 · Cited by 1,669
Hospitalization and mortality among Black patients and White patients with Covid-19.
Price-Haywood, E. G., Burton, J., Fort, D., & Seoane, L. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa2011686 · Cited by 1,660
Cited by
Hansen, C. H., Michlmayr, D., Gubbels, S. M., Mølbak, K., & Ethelberg, S. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00575-4 · Cited by 586
Serological evidence of human infection with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chen, X., Chen, Z., Azman, A. S., Deng, X., Sun, R., Zhao, Z., Zheng, N., Chen, X., Lu, W., Zhuang, T., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00026-7 · Cited by 239
Global seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bobrovitz, N., Arora, R. K., Cao, C., Boucher, E., Liu, M., Donnici, C., Yanes-Lane, M., Whelan, M., Perlman-Arrow, S., Chen, J., et al. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252617 · Cited by 246
Singh, S., McNab, C., Olson, R. M., Bristol, N., Nolan, C., Bergstrøm, E., Bartos, M., Mabuchi, S., Panjabi, R., Karan, A., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01897-3 · Cited by 141
Vial, P., González, C., Icaza, G., Ramirez-Santana, M., Quezada-Gaete, R., Núñez-Franz, L., Apablaza, M., Vial, C., Rubilar, P., Correa, J., et al. (2022) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07045-7 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Rostami, A., Sepidarkish, M., Leeflang, M. M. G., Riahi, S. M., Nourollahpour Shiadeh, M., Esfandyari, S., Mokdad, A. H., Hotez, P. J., & Gasser, R. B.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-340
- ISSN
- 1198-743X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093877663
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.020
- The paper
- Rostami, A., Sepidarkish, M., Leeflang, M. M. G., Riahi, S. M., Nourollahpour Shiadeh, M., Esfandyari, S., Mokdad, A. H., Hotez, P. J., & Gasser, R. B. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.