Cited by 141Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 ChallengesGlobal Security and Public HealthCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

How an outbreak became a pandemic: a chronological analysis of crucial junctures and international obligations in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Singh, Sudhvir, McNab, Christine, Olson, Rose McKeon, Bristol, Nellie, Nolan, Cody, Bergstrøm, Elin, Bartos, Michael, Mabuchi, Shunsuke +9 more·2021·The Lancet

Abstract

Understanding the spread of SARS-CoV-2, how and when evidence emerged, and the timing of local, national, regional, and global responses is essential to establish how an outbreak became a pandemic and to prepare for future health threats. With that aim, the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response has developed a chronology of events, actions, and recommendations, from December, 2019, when the first cases of COVID-19 were identified in China, to the end of March, 2020, by which time the outbreak had spread extensively worldwide and had been characterised as a pandemic. Datapoints are based on two literature reviews, WHO documents and correspondence, submissions to the Panel, and an expert verification process. The retrospective analysis of the chronology shows a dedicated initial response by WHO and some national governments, but also aspects of the response that could have been quicker, including outbreak notifications under the International Health Regulations (IHR), presumption and confirmation of human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2, declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, and, most importantly, the public health response of many national governments. The chronology also shows that some countries, largely those with previous experience with similar outbreaks, reacted quickly, even ahead of WHO alerts, and were more successful in initially containing the virus. Mapping actions against IHR obligations, the chronology shows where efficiency and accountability could be improved at local, national, and international levels to more quickly alert and contain health threats in the future. In particular, these improvements include necessary reforms to international law and governance for pandemic preparedness and response, including the IHR and a potential framework convention on pandemic preparedness and response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01897-3

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]Independent Panel on Pandemic Preparedness and Response Final report of the Independent Panel on Pandemic Preparedness and Response https://theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/COVID-19-Make-it-the-Last-Pandemic_final.pdf 2021 PMC9751704 33991477
  2. [46]Cohen J Chinese researchers reveal draft genome of virus implicated in Wuhan pneumonia outbreak. Science Magazine https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/chinese-researchers-reveal-draft-genome-virus-implicated-wuhan-pneumonia-outbreak Jan 11, 2020
  3. [58]Allam Z Surveying the Covid-19 pandemic and its implications 2020 Elsevier Amsterdam
  4. [81]Daszak P das Neves C Amuasi J Workshop report on biodiversity and pandemics of the intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services https://zenodo.org/record/4158500#.YUoSvY70mUk Oct 29, 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, S., McNab, C., Olson, R. M., Bristol, N., Nolan, C., Bergstrøm, E., Bartos, M., Mabuchi, S., Panjabi, R., Karan, A., Abdalla, S. M., Bonk, M., Jamieson, M., Werner, G. K., Nordström, A., Legido-Quigley, H., & Phelan, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Singh, Sudhvir
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
398
Issue
10316
Pages
2109-2124
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3213424646
Cited by
141
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 5
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, pandemic preparedness and response, International Health Regulations, public health emergency of international concern, World Health Organization, outbreak response, international obligations, human-to-human transmission, containment, international governance
MeSH terms
International Health Regulations, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Animals, China, Disease Outbreaks, Humans, International Cooperation, Time Factors, Global Health, World Health Organization, Zoonoses, Risk Assessment, Information Dissemination, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review