Cited by 6Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Spatial Transcriptomics Unveils Regional Heterogeneity and Subclonal Dynamics in the Lung Adenocarcinoma Microenvironment

An, Haoyuan, Fang, Wei, Chen, Haiyan, Huang, Weiying, Liu, Hongbin, Zhang, Zhenlei, Zhao, Hanzhu, Zhang, Yanbing +3 more·2025·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Background and objective Lung adenocarcinoma has high incidence and mortality rates. While single-cell transcriptomics reveals tumor cell heterogeneity, it lacks spatial detail, leaving the spatial dynamics and functional heterogeneity largely unexplored. This study aims to utilize spatial transcriptomics to provide a comprehensive cellular landscape of lung adenocarcinoma, addressing the limitations of single-cell analysis.Methods Utilizing cell type-specific markers and spatial transcriptomics data derived from single-cell transcriptomic analysis, we performed cell deconvolution, assessed tissue preferences, constructed trajectories, and analyzed spot-spot interactions to create a comprehensive cellular landscape of lung adenocarcinoma.Results We conducted unsupervised dimensionality reduction clustering on 125,203 single cells from single-cell transcriptomics, and used this data to deconvolute the cellular composition of each of the 3990 spots in a separately analyzed spatial transcriptomics sample. By constructing a trajectory from the tumor's periphery to its core, we discovered that pathways related to oxygen level responses were significantly upregulated, while immune response pathways were notably downregulated. Pseudotime analysis identified fibroblast areas closely associated with the tumor, with neighboring tumor areas exhibiting strong epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor migration characteristics, defined as the direction of tumor invasion. Further dimensionality reduction clustering within the tumor area differentiated six subgroups, each showing significant spatial and functional heterogeneity. Notably, the Ca_0 subgroup is closely linked to the tumor invasion process, whereas the Ca_1 subgroup is significantly associated with poor prognosis. Interaction analysis suggests that the Ca_1 subgroup may facilitate overall tumor progression by promoting angiogenesis and immune escape, rather than by directly participating in tumor invasion.Conclusions This study provides an in-depth analysis of the spatial-functional heterogeneity in lung adenocarcinoma and its microenvironment, revealing four functionally heterogeneous groups with significant spatial and functional diversity within the tumor microenvironment. The study also identifies key areas and gene expression changes closely associated with tumor invasion and progression, highlighting critical aspects of tumor dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108929

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proteogenomic studies in hepatocellular carcinoma have identified three molecular classes: immune-hot with favorable outcomes, proliferative and TP53-enriched with angiogenic signaling and poorer outcomes, and CTNNB1-enriched with mTOR-pathway activation.

    “In hepatocellular carcinoma, for example, proteogenomic studies integrating whole-genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and quantitative proteomics have identified three molecular classes: immune-“hot” with favorable outcomes, proliferative and TP53-enriched with angiogenic signaling and poorer outcomes, and CTNNB1-enriched with mTOR-pathway activation [88,89,90].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
An, H., Fang, W., Chen, H., Huang, W., Liu, H., Zhang, Z., Zhao, H., Zhang, Y., Zhao, M., Qiu, J., & Li, W.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Qingdao Municipal Hospital (CN)
  • Shandong Tumor Hospital (CN)
  • Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhao, Hanzhu
  • Zhao, Miaoqing
  • Qiu, Jianfeng
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-10
Volume
270
Pages
108929
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411870354
Cited by
6
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
lung adenocarcinoma, tumor microenvironment, spatial heterogeneity, cell type deconvolution, tumor invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, tumor progression, angiogenesis, immune evasion, pseudotime trajectory, cell-cell interactions, prognostic subgroups
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma of Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Cluster Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Single-Cell Analysis, Tumor Microenvironment, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review