Cited by 38Student Stress and CopingResilience and Mental HealthDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Stress, resilience, and emotional well-being in children and adolescents with specific learning disabilities

Open access
Stein, Brianna, Hoeft, Fumiko, Richter, Caroline G·2024·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

This article reviews the prevalence of stress and explores resilience factors in children and adolescents with specific learning disabilities (SLDs). We show that the increased stress and emotional challenges faced by this group are likely due to societal pressures and stigma. Recent findings on neuroendocrine changes in this population are discussed, suggesting a predisposition to psychiatric disorders. This review advocates for a societal shift towards the neurodiversity paradigm, which recognizes SLDs as natural variations in brain function, emphasizing individual strengths and promoting a more inclusive approach that values cognitive diversity. Such advocacy is likely important to combat stress and stigma in those with SLDs. This article also reviews recent work identifying resilience-promoting factors, such as perception of self and peer/teacher relationships, for enhancing emotional well-being and mental health for children and adolescents with SLD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101410

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Culturally appropriate programs that engage families and communities have effectively promoted brain health.

    “Culturally appropriate programs that engage families and communities have effectively promoted brain health102.”

    From Resilience and brain health in global populations (2025) · cites this paper as [102]

    The Interventions section (page unavailable) discusses family support, community-level approaches, and culturally sensitive social-emotional development for children with specific learning disabilities. It does not establish that programs combining these features have effectively promoted brain health; it also says evidence for interventions across levels is limited. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sex, gender, ethnicity, and age influence resilience through their effects on stress responses.

    “Sex, gender, ethnicity, and age all shape resilience via their influence on responses to stress7,99–106.”

    From Resilience and brain health in global populations (2025) · cites this paper as [102]

    The Resilience factors section describes resilience in relation to stress and discusses personal and environmental protective factors in children with specific learning disabilities. It does not say that sex, gender, ethnicity, or age shape resilience through stress responses; searches for those demographic terms found no passage establishing that link. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [34]Catts HW, Petscher Y: A Cumulative Risk and Resilience Model of Dyslexia. J Learn Disabil 2022, 55: 171– 184. 34365842
  2. [39]Haft SL, Myers CA, Hoeft F: Socio-Emotional and Cognitive Resilience in Children with Reading Disabilities. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2016, 10: 133– 141. 27747263 PMC5058360
  3. [47]Haft SL, Chen T, Leblanc C, Tencza F, Hoeft F: Impact of mentoring on socio-emotional and mental health outcomes of youth with learning disabilities and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2019, 24: 318– 328. 31649490 PMC6812582
  4. [49]Iznardo M, Ryan J, Rogers M, McKibbin S, Piers L, Hogan T: Examining Resiliency in Children with Learning Disabilities and Co-Occurring ADHD Symptoms: The Protective Role of a Close Teacher-Student Relationship. Learn Disabil Contemp J 2023, 21: 1– 16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, B., Hoeft, F., & Richter, C. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hoeft, Fumiko
  • Richter, Caroline G
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
58
Pages
101410
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399117545
Cited by
38
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Connecticut
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (U24AT011281)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
specific learning disabilities, stress, resilience, emotional well-being, stigma, neuroendocrine changes, mental illness, neurodiversity, inclusive education, self-perception, peer relationships, teacher relationships, children and adolescents, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review