Stability and dissolution of electrocatalysts: Building the bridge between model and “real world” systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrocatalysts with low Pt loading often suffer from low stability and short durability due to detachment and dissolution of Pt-NPs.
“However, such electrocatalysts often suffer from low stability and short durability due to the detachment and dissolution of Pt-NPs.[24–26]”
Cites
Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells
Debe, M. K. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11115 · Cited by 5,885 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wu, Z.-Y., Chen, F.-Y., Li, B., Yu, S.-W., Finfrock, Y. Z., Meira, D. M., Yan, Q.-Q., Zhu, P., Chen, M.-X., Song, T.-W., et al. (2023) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01380-5 · Cited by 1,004 · see citing works
Stability of electrocatalytic OER: from principle to application
Li, H., Lin, Y., Duan, J., Wen, Q., Liu, Y., & Zhai, T. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00010a · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Recent progress on the long‐term stability of hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalysts
Zhai, W., Ma, Y., Chen, D., Ho, J. C., Dai, Z., & Qu, Y. (2022) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12357 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Sandbeck, D. J. S., Secher, N. M., Speck, F. D., Sørensen, J. E., Kibsgaard, J., Chorkendorff, I., & Cherevko, S. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c00779 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationAlsuhile, A., Pein, P. S., Barım, Ş. B., Bozbağ, S. E., Smirnova, I., Erkey, C., & Schroeter, B. (2025) · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · doi:10.1002/aesr.202400433 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cherevko, S.
- Affiliations
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Cherevko, Serhiy
- ORCID
- Cherevko, Serhiy
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 118-125
- ISSN
- 2451-9103 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2796318705
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Electrochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Keywords
- electrocatalyst stability, catalyst dissolution, oxygen reduction reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, platinum catalysts, iridium catalysts, ruthenium catalysts, catalyst loading, catalyst deactivation, catalyst layer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
