Cited by 29Advanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesGas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

Electrical sensing of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath for disease diagnosis

Yan, Hailong, Zhou, Yi-Ge·2022·Current Opinion in Electrochemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100922

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, H., & Zhou, Y.-G.
Affiliations
Hunan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yan, Hailong
  • Zhou, Yi-Ge
Venue
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
33
Pages
100922
ISSN
2451-9103 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200423997
Cited by
29
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21804036, 51903216)
  • Hunan University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
volatile organic compounds, electrical sensors, metal oxide semiconductor sensors, polymer sensors, acetone, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, disease biomarkers, background interference, data recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review