Cited by 36Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

The common ground between sensory and consumer science

Grunert, Klaus G·2015·Current Opinion in Food Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cofs.2014.11.003

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grunert, K. G.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Grunert, Klaus G
Venue
Current Opinion in Food Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
3
Pages
19-22
ISSN
2214-7993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012991873
Cited by
36
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Food Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
sensory science, consumer science, food quality perception, dietary intake, purchase decision, cooking, interdisciplinary integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review