The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: coincidence detection of oscillatory processes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction
Robinson, T. (1993) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-p · Cited by 7,346
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.6.532 · Cited by 3,023 · cited 1×
“As outcome uncertainty has been shown to be proportional to attention [154], it follows that dopamine levels would also be proportional to attention, thereby implicating dopamine-induced changes in clock speed.”
BackgroundFunctional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop
Parent, A., & Hazrati, L.-N. (1995) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-c · Cited by 2,161
Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons
Fiorillo, C. D., Tobler, P. N., & Schultz, W. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077349 · Cited by 2,085
Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function
Middleton, F. A., & Strick, P. L. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7939688 · Cited by 1,356
Models of Information Processing in the Basal Ganglia
(1994) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4708.001.0001 · Cited by 1,190
Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions
Ljungberg, T., Apicella, P., & Schultz, W. (1992) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1992.67.1.145 · Cited by 987
Gawin, F. H., & Ellinwood, E. H. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198805053181806 · Cited by 965
Cited by
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing
Buhusi, C. V., & Meck, W. H. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1764 · Cited by 2,062
Self-citationThe image of time: A voxel-wise meta-analysis
Wiener, M., Turkeltaub, P., & Coslett, H. B. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.064 · Cited by 594
Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception
Ivry, R. B., & Schlerf, J. E. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.002 · Cited by 615
Timing in the Absence of Clocks: Encoding Time in Neural Network States
Karmarkar, U. R., & Buonomano, D. V. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.006 · Cited by 577
Metadata
- Authors
- Matell, M. S., & Meck, W. H.
- Venue
- Cognitive Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-170
- ISSN
- 0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164146725
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: coincidence detection of oscillatory processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.012
- The paper
- Matell, M. S., & Meck, W. H. (2004). Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: coincidence detection of oscillatory processes. Cognitive Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
