The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Cummins, R., & Fodor, J. (1985) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184717 · Cited by 4,791
Handbook of the Psychology of Aging
(2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-07221-3 · Cited by 3,394
Cosmides, L. (1989) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1 · Cited by 2,471
Happé, F. G. E. (1994) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02172093 · Cited by 2,352
Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control and Children's Theory of Mind
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00333 · Cited by 2,072
Handbook of the Psychology of Aging
Howell, S. C. (1978) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/18.1.89 · Cited by 1,888
Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind
Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x · Cited by 1,766
Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3 · Cited by 1,396
Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(85)90051-7 · Cited by 1,380
Cited by
Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states
Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0016923 · Cited by 1,261
Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see.
Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0018729 · Cited by 733
How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind
BUTTERFILL, S. A., & APPERLY, I. A. (2013) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12036 · Cited by 623
Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Làdavas, E., & di Pellegrino, G. (2007) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsm001 · Cited by 436
Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account
Cabeza, R., Ciaramelli, E., & Moscovitch, M. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.008 · Cited by 373
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McKinnon, M. C., & Moscovitch, M.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-218
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035186400
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 17.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.011
- The paper
- McKinnon, M. C., & Moscovitch, M. (2007). Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
