Cited by 24Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Belief–desire reasoning in the explanation of behavior: Do actions speak louder than words?

Wertz, Annie E., German, Tamsin C.·2007·Cognition

Abstract

The mechanisms underwriting our commonsense psychology, or 'theory of mind', have been extensively investigated via reasoning tasks that require participants to predict the action of agents based on information about beliefs and desires. However, relatively few studies have investigated the processes contributing to a central component of 'theory of mind' - our ability to explain the action of agents in terms of underlying beliefs and desires. In two studies, we demonstrate a novel phenomenon in adult belief-desire reasoning, capturing the folk notion that 'actions speak louder than words'. When story characters were described as searching in the wrong place for a target object, adult subjects often endorsed mental state explanations referencing a distracter object, but only when that object was approached. We discuss how this phenomenon, alongside other reasoning "errors" (e.g., hindsight bias; the curse of knowledge) can be used to illuminate the architecture of domain specific belief-desire reasoning processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.08.002

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence for continued influence on adults of developmentally earlier modes of thought is available from studies of reasoning errors.

    “Evidence for the continued influence on adults of developmentally earlier modes of thought is available from studies of reasoning 'errors' (e.g., hindsight bias, 'the curse of knowledge,' 'actions speak louder than words'; Birch & Bloom, 2007; Blank, Nestler, von Collani, & Fischer, 2008; Wertz & German, 2007)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wertz, A. E., & German, T. C.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
German, Tamsin C.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
184-194
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983772872
Cited by
24
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
belief-desire reasoning, theory of mind, folk psychology, explanation of action, reasoning errors, hindsight bias, curse of knowledge
MeSH terms
Adult, Concept Formation, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Problem Solving, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review