Cited by 40Spam and Phishing DetectionComplex Network Analysis TechniquesMisinformation and Its Impacts

Emergent properties, models, and laws of behavioral similarities within groups of twitter users

Cresci, Stefano, Di Pietro, Roberto, Petrocchi, Marinella, Spognardi, Angelo, Tesconi, Maurizio·2020·Computer Communications

Abstract

Abstract DNA-inspired online behavioral modeling techniques have been proposed and successfully applied to a broad range of tasks. In this paper, we investigate the fundamental laws that drive the occurrence of behavioral similarities among Twitter users, employing a DNA-inspired technique. Our findings are multifold. First, we demonstrate that, despite apparently featuring little to no similarities, the online behaviors of Twitter users are far from being uniformly random. Secondly, we benchmark different behavioral models through a number of simulations. We characterize the main properties of such models and we identify those models that better resemble human behaviors in Twitter. Then, we demonstrate that the number and the extent of behavioral similarities within a group of Twitter users obey a log-normal law, and we leverage this characterization to propose a novel bot detection system. In a nutshell, the results shed light on the fundamental properties that drive the online behaviors of groups of Twitter users, through the lenses of DNA-inspired behavioral modeling techniques. This study is based on a wealth of data gathered over several months that, for the sake of reproducibility, are publicly available for research purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.019

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human behaviors are intrinsically more heterogeneous than automated ones.

    “The rationale behind this approach is based on evidence suggesting that human behaviors are intrinsically more heterogeneous than automated ones [7].”

    From A decade of social bot detection (2020) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cresci, S., Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A., & Tesconi, M.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IT)
  • IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Spognardi, Angelo
Venue
Computer Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
150
Pages
47-61
ISSN
0140-3664 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982047289
Cited by
40
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Communications (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Dipartimento di Informatica, Sapienza Università di Roma
  • Scuola IMT Alti Studi Lucca
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
Twitter users, online behavior, behavioral similarity, lognormal distribution, bot detection, behavioral models, social media behavior, emergent properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review