The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning and big data technologies for IoT security
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Technology has become inevitable in human life, especially the growth of Internet of Things (IoT), which enables communication and interaction with various devices. However, IoT has been proven to be vulnerable to security breaches. Therefore, it is necessary to develop fool proof solutions by creating new technologies or combining existing technologies to address the security issues. Deep learning, a branch of machine learning has shown promising results in previous studies for detection of security breaches. Additionally, IoT devices generate large volumes, variety, and veracity of data. Thus, when big data technologies are incorporated, higher performance and better data handling can be achieved. Hence, we have conducted a comprehensive survey on state-of-the-art deep learning, IoT security, and big data technologies. Further, a comparative analysis and the relationship among deep learning, IoT security, and big data technologies have also been discussed. Further, we have derived a thematic taxonomy from the comparative analysis of technical studies of the three aforementioned domains. Finally, we have identified and discussed the challenges in incorporating deep learning for IoT security using big data technologies and have provided directions to future researchers on the IoT security aspects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · Cited by 7,515
Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation
Powers, D. M. W. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.16061 · Cited by 5,440
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 1×
“The MCC values ranges from −1 to +1, where −1 denotes total disagreement, 0 indicates random predications and +1 indicates total agreement [104,105].”
BackgroundBeyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics
Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007 · Cited by 4,226
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Jha, S., Fredrikson, M., Celik, Z. B., & Swami, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2016.36 · Cited by 3,993
Deep learning for visual understanding: A review
Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S., & Lew, M. S. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116 · Cited by 2,504
Deep learning for sensor-based activity recognition: A survey
Wang, J., Chen, Y., Hao, S., Peng, X., & Hu, L. (2019) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.02.010 · Cited by 2,014
Apache Hadoop YARN: yet another resource negotiator
Vavilapalli, V. K., Murthy, A. C., Douglas, C., Agarwal, S., Konar, M., Evans, R., Graves, T., Lowe, J., Shah, H., Seth, S., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the 4th annual Symposium on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1145/2523616.2523633 · Cited by 1,848
End-to-end encrypted traffic classification with one-dimensional convolution neural networks
Wang, W., Zhu, M., Wang, J., Zeng, X., & Yang, Z. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi.2017.8004872 · Cited by 991 · cited 1×
“Computational and energy constraint ∙ Low-dimensional domain ∙ Lightweight model [25,29,82,181] ∙ Dimensionality reduction ∙ MLLib library in Apache Spark ∙ Large scale big data analytics ∙ Edge or cloud computing ∙ Distributed algorithms ∙ Distributed system ∙ High-speed networks (5G)”
BackgroundBig IoT data analytics: Architecture, opportunities, and open research challenges
(2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2689040 · Cited by 980
Self-citationA Survey of Deep Learning: Platforms, Applications and Emerging Research Trends
Hatcher, W. G., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2830661 · Cited by 654
A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Cyber Security
Berman, D. S., Buczak, A. L., Chavis, J. S., & Corbett, C. L. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10040122 · Cited by 569
Internet of Things: Security vulnerabilities and challenges
Andrea, I., Chrysostomou, C., & Hadjichristofi, G. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC) · doi:10.1109/iscc.2015.7405513 · Cited by 520
Real-time big data processing for anomaly detection: A survey
Ariyaluran Habeeb, R. A., Nasaruddin, F., Gani, A., Targio Hashem, I. A., Ahmed, E., & Imran, M. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.006 · Cited by 487
Self-citationA deep learning approach to on-node sensor data analytics for mobile or wearable devices
Ravi, D., Wong, C., Lo, B., & Yang, G.-Z. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2016.2633287 · Cited by 439
CNTK: Microsoft's Open-Source Deep-Learning Toolkit
Seide, F., & Agarwal, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2945397 · Cited by 382
Securing the Internet of Things: Challenges, threats and solutions
Radoglou Grammatikis, P. I., Sarigiannidis, P. G., & Moscholios, I. D. (2019) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2018.11.003 · Cited by 308
Kotenko, I., Saenko, I., Kushnerevich, A., & Branitskiy, A. (2019) · 2019 27th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP) · doi:10.1109/empdp.2019.8671571 · Cited by 30
Cited by
Alzubaidi, L., Bai, J., Al-Sabaawi, A., Santamaría, J., Albahri, A. S., Al-dabbagh, B. S. N., Fadhel, M. A., Manoufali, M., Zhang, J., Al-Timemy, A. H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-023-00727-2 · Cited by 907
Using the internet of things in smart energy systems and networks
Ahmad, T., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102783 · Cited by 332
A Novel Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System for IoT Networks
Awajan, A. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12020034 · Cited by 292
Machine learning approaches to IoT security: A systematic literature review
Ahmad, R., & Alsmadi, I. (2021) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2021.100365 · Cited by 285
Internet of Things attack detection using hybrid Deep Learning Model
Sahu, A. K., Sharma, S., Tanveer, M., & Raja, R. (2021) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2021.05.024 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Amanullah, M. A., Habeeb, R. A. A., Nasaruddin, F. H., Gani, A., Ahmed, E., Nainar, A. S. M., Akim, N. M., & Imran, M.
- Venue
- Computer Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 495-517
- ISSN
- 0140-3664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000094279
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 28.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
