Cited by 226Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G

TSCRNN: A novel classification scheme of encrypted traffic based on flow spatiotemporal features for efficient management of IIoT

Lin, Kunda, Xu, Xiaolong, Gao, Honghao·2021·Computer Networks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107974

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, K., Xu, X., & Gao, H.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Shanghai University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Xiaolong
  • Gao, Honghao
Venue
Computer Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
190
Pages
107974
ISSN
1389-1286 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134226201
Cited by
226
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 3
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Networks (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Keywords
encrypted traffic classification, Industrial Internet of Things, spatio-temporal features, bidirectional LSTM, CNN feature extraction, traffic sampling, network traffic characterization, 5G

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review