Cited by 6Network Security and Intrusion DetectionInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

MT-FBERT: Malicious Traffic Detection Based on Efficient Federated Learning of BERT

Open access
Tang, Jian, Huang, Zhao, Li, Chunqiang·2025·Future Internet

Abstract

The rising frequency of network intrusions has significantly impacted critical infrastructures, leading to an increased focus on the detection of malicious network traffic in recent years. However, traditional port-based and classical machine learning-based malicious network traffic detection methods suffer from a dependence on expert experience and limited generalizability. In this paper, we propose a malicious traffic detection method based on an efficient federated learning framework of Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), called MT-FBERT. It offers two major advantages over most existing approaches. First, MT-FBERT pretrains BERT using two pre-training tasks along with an overall pre-training loss on large-scale unlabeled network traffic, allowing the model to automatically learn generalized traffic representations, which do not require human experience to extract the behavior features or label the malicious samples. Second, MT-FBERT finetunes BERT for malicious network traffic detection through an efficient federated learning framework, which both protects the data privacy of critical infrastructures and reduces resource consumption by dynamically identifying and updating only the most significant neurons in the global model. Evaluation experiments on public datasets demonstrated that MT-FBERT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in malicious network traffic detection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fi17080323

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, J., Huang, Z., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • China International Water & Electric Corp., Beijing 101116, China
  • Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tang, Jian
Venue
Future Internet
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-07-23
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
323
ISSN
1999-5903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412616751
Cited by
6
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Internet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Basic Research Program of Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department, China (202501AS070131)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
malicious traffic detection, federated learning, BERT, pre-training, critical infrastructure security, data privacy, network intrusion detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review