Cited by 151Pasture and Agricultural SystemsSmart Agriculture and AIAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems

PastureBase Ireland: a grassland decision support system and national database

Open access
Hanrahan, Liam, Geoghegan, Anne, O'Donovan, Michael, Griffith, Vincent, Ruelle, Elodie, Wallace, Michael, Shalloo, Laurence·2017·Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Abstract

PastureBase Ireland (PBI) is a web-based grassland management application incorporating a dual function of grassland decision support and a centralized national database to collate commercial farm grassland data. This database facilitates the collection and storage of vast quantities of grassland data from grassland farmers. The database spans across ruminant grassland enterprises – dairy, beef and sheep. To help farmers determine appropriate actions around grassland management, we have developed this data informed decision support tool to function at the paddock level. Individual farmers enter data through the completion of regular pasture cover estimations across the farm, allowing the performance of individual paddocks to be evaluated within and across years. To evaluate the PBI system, we compared actual pasture cut experimental data (Etesia cuts) to PBI calculated outputs. We examined three comparisons, comparing PBI outputs to actual pasture cut data, for individual DM yields at defoliation (Comparison 1), for cumulative annual DM yields including silage data (Comparison 2) and, for cumulative annual DM yields excluding silage data (Comparison 3). We found an acceptable accuracy between PBI outputs and pasture cut data when statistically analyzed using relative prediction error and concordance correlation coefficients for the measurement of total annual DM yield (Comparison 2), with a relative prediction error of 15.4% and a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.85. We demonstrated an application of the PBI system through analysis of commercial farm data across two years (2014–2015) for 75 commercial farms who actively use the system. The analysis showed there was a significant increase in DM yield from 2014 to 2015. The results indicated a greater variation in pasture growth across paddocks within farms than across farms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compag.2017.01.029

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many factors influencing grass production and utilisation are outside the farmer's direct control, such as weather and agronomic conditions.

    “A potential explanation for this insignificant finding is that many factors influencing grass production and utilisation are outside of the farmer's direct control, such as weather and agronomic conditions (Hanrahan et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hurtado-Uria, C., 2013. Adaption, Evaluation and Validation of a Mechanistic Grass Growth Simulation Model for Temperate Grass Based Systems Ph.D Thesis. Cork Institute of Technology, p. 236.
  2. Macdonald, K., Glassey, C., Rawnsley, R., 2010. The emergence, development and effectiveness of decision rules for pasture based dairy systems. In: Edwards, G. R., Bryant, R.H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium, pp. 199-209.
  3. O'Donovan, M., 2000. The Relationship between the Performance of Dairy Cows and Grassland Management Practice on Intensive Dairy Farms in Ireland PhD Thesis. National University of Ireland, p. 366.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanrahan, L., Geoghegan, A., O'Donovan, M., Griffith, V., Ruelle, E., Wallace, M., & Shalloo, L.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Corresponding author
Hanrahan, Liam
Venue
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
136
Pages
193-201
ISSN
0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914305340
Cited by
151
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
FWCI
34.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • T-Stór (Teagasc) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • T-Stór (Teagasc) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Keywords
grassland management, decision support system, dry matter yield, silage, dairy farms, beef cattle farms, sheep farms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review