The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A review
Abstract
Abstract Accurate yield estimation and optimised nitrogen management is essential in agriculture. Remote sensing (RS) systems are being more widely used in building decision support tools for contemporary farming systems to improve yield production and nitrogen management while reducing operating costs and environmental impact. However, RS based approaches require processing of enormous amounts of remotely sensed data from different platforms and, therefore, greater attention is currently being devoted to machine learning (ML) methods. This is due to the capability of machine learning based systems to process a large number of inputs and handle non-linear tasks. This paper discusses research developments conducted within the last 15 years on machine learning based techniques for accurate crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation. The paper concludes that the rapid advances in sensing technologies and ML techniques will provide cost-effective and comprehensive solutions for better crop and environment state estimation and decision making. More targeted application of the sensor platforms and ML techniques, the fusion of different sensor modalities and expert knowledge, and the development of hybrid systems combining different ML and signal processing techniques are all likely to be part of precision agriculture (PA) in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Papageorgiou, E. I., Markinos, A. T., & Gemtos, T. A. (2011) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.036 · Cited by 157
A NEURAL NETWORK FOR SETTING TARGET CORN YIELDS
Liu, J., Goering, C. E., & Tian, L. (2001) · Transactions of the ASAE · doi:10.13031/2013.6097 · Cited by 136
Plant Phenotyping using Probabilistic Topic Models: Uncovering the Hyperspectral Language of Plants
Wahabzada, M., Mahlein, A.-K., Bauckhage, C., Steiner, U., Oerke, E.-C., & Kersting, K. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep22482 · Cited by 118
Cited by
Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges
Yuan, Q., Shen, H., Li, T., Li, Z., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, H., Tan, W., Yang, Q., Wang, J., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716 · Cited by 1,697
Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment
Finger, R., Swinton, S. M., El Benni, N., & Walter, A. (2019) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093929 · Cited by 539
Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence to enable sustainable and precision agriculture
Zhang, P., Guo, Z., Ullah, S., Melagraki, G., Afantitis, A., & Lynch, I. (2021) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00946-6 · Cited by 478
An overview of smart irrigation systems using IoT
Obaideen, K., Yousef, B. A. A., AlMallahi, M. N., Tan, Y. C., Mahmoud, M., Jaber, H., & Ramadan, M. (2022) · Energy Nexus · doi:10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100124 · Cited by 448
Berger, K., Verrelst, J., Féret, J.-B., Wang, Z., Wocher, M., Strathmann, M., Danner, M., Mauser, W., & Hank, T. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111758 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Chlingaryan, A., Sukkarieh, S., & Whelan, B.
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 61-69
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2805142011
- Cited by
- 1,577
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 72.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.012
- The paper
- Chlingaryan, A., Sukkarieh, S., & Whelan, B. (2018). Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.