Cited by 177Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Generative machine learning for de novo drug discovery: A systematic review

Martinelli, Dominic D.·2022·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Recent research on artificial intelligence indicates that machine learning algorithms can auto-generate novel drug-like molecules. Generative models have revolutionized de novo drug discovery, rendering the explorative process more efficient. Several model frameworks and input formats have been proposed to enhance the performance of intelligent algorithms in generative molecular design. In this systematic literature review of experimental articles and reviews over the last five years, machine learning models, challenges associated with computational molecule design along with proposed solutions, and molecular encoding methods are discussed. A query-based search of the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer, Wiley Online Library, arXiv, MDPI, bioRxiv, and IEEE Xplore databases yielded 87 studies. Twelve additional studies were identified via citation searching. Of the articles in which machine learning was implemented, six prominent algorithms were identified: long short-term memory recurrent neural networks (LSTM-RNNs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), adversarial autoencoders (AAEs), evolutionary algorithms, and gated recurrent unit (GRU-RNNs). Furthermore, eight central challenges were designated: homogeneity of generated molecular libraries, deficient synthesizability, limited assay data, model interpretability, incapacity for multi-property optimization, incomparability, restricted molecule size, and uncertainty in model evaluation. Molecu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105403

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Techniques such as generative adversarial networks combined with reinforcement learning allow the intelligent generation of molecular graph representations.

    “Techniques such as GANs combined with reinforcement learning allow the intelligent generation of molecular graph representations [22].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinelli, D. D.
Corresponding author
Martinelli, Dominic D.
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
145
Pages
105403
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221062742
Cited by
177
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 8
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
generative machine learning, de novo drug discovery, generative molecular design, molecular encoding, variational autoencoder, generative adversarial networks, adversarial autoencoder, recurrent neural networks, evolutionary algorithms, multi-property optimization, model interpretability
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Drug Design, Neural Networks, Computer, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review