Cited by 43Granular flow and fluidized bedsFluid Dynamics and MixingParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

On the representation of QMOM as a weighted-residual method-The dual-quadrature method of generalized moments

Lage, Paulo L.C.·2011·Computers & Chemical Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.05.017

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lage [318] developed DuQMoGeM, using one quadrature rule for discretizing the particulate system and another for evaluating integrals of breakage and aggregation terms; it is based on an extension of MOM-WRM and implemented in a Galerkin formulation.

    “A further contribution has been proposed by Lage [318] who developed a new method called the dual quadrature method of generalized moments (DuQMoGeM). One quadrature rule is employed for discretizing the particulate system and another one is utilized to evaluate the integrals of the breakage and aggregation terms in the equations of the moments. The whole approach is based on an extension of the M”
  • DuQMoGeM numerical results for pure growth, breakage, and aggregation are compared to analytical solutions, showing that they are generally more accurate than results obtained with QMOM.

    “Numerical results for pure growth, breakage, and aggregation cases are compared to analytical solutions, showing that they are in general more accurate than the results that can be obtained with the QMOM.”
  • EQMOM numerical results compare favorably with available analytical ones for PBE considering aggregation, breakage, condensation, and evaporation.

    “The EQMOM has been used to solve a PBE considering aggregation, breakage, condensation, and evaporation terms, and the numerical results compare favorably with the available analytical ones [288,293,301,318,322].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lage, P. L. C.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Lage, Paulo L.C.
Venue
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
2186-2203
ISSN
0098-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052797395
Cited by
43
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Chemical Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Keywords
quadrature method of moments, weighted residual method, generalized moments, population balance equation, Galerkin method, particle breakage, particle aggregation, particulate systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review