Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 640

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK

Li, Nai, Kirkup, Gill·2007·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Allwood, 1990, Conceptions of computers among students in China and Sweden, Computers in Human Behaviour, 6, 185, 10.1016/0747-5632(90)90006-3 · doi:10.1016/0747-5632(90)90006-3
  2. Boone, 1997, Science attitudes of selected middle school students in China: a preliminary investigation of similarities and differences as a function of gender, School Science and Mathematics, 97, 96, 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17349.x · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17349.x
  3. Brown, 1998, A comparison of attitudes toward computers among business professionals in China, Japan, and the United States, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Spring, 1, 10.1080/08874417.1998.11647334 · doi:10.1080/08874417.1998.11647334
  4. Campbell, 1984, Predicting the success of freshman in a computer science major, Communications of the ACM, 27, 1108, 10.1145/1968.358288 · doi:10.1145/1968.358288
  5. Clegg, 1999, Disciplinary discourse: a case study of gender in information technology and design courses, Gender and Education, 11, 43, 10.1080/09540259920753 · doi:10.1080/09540259920753
  6. Collis, 1985, Reflections on inequities in computer education: do the rich get richer?, Education and Computing, 1, 179, 10.1016/S0167-9287(85)91519-5 · doi:10.1016/s0167-9287(85)91519-5
  7. Collis, 1999, Designing for differences: cultural issues in the design of WWW-based course-support sites, British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 201, 10.1111/1467-8535.00110 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Durndell, 1995, Gender and computing: persisting differences, Educational Research, 37, 219, 10.1080/0013188950370301 · doi:10.1080/0013188950370301
  9. Durndell, 1993, Gender and computing: change over time?, Computers & Education, 21, 16, 10.1016/0360-1315(93)90036-I · doi:10.1016/0360-1315(93)90036-i
  10. Durndell, 1987, A survey of attitudes to, knowledge about and experience of computers, Computers & Education, 11, 167, 10.1016/0360-1315(87)90051-0 · doi:10.1016/0360-1315(87)90051-0
  11. Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) (1999). ‘Gender and differential achievement in education and training: a research review’, retrieved 25 June, 2000 from http://www.eoc.org.uk/EOCeng/dynpages/research_edu.asp.
  12. Ford, 1996, Gender differences in Internet perceptions and use, Aslib Proceedings, 48, 183
  13. Gibbs, 1998, Women on the Web: a two-year journey in cyberspace, The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 5, 253, 10.1177/135050689800500209 · doi:10.1177/135050689800500209
  14. Kirkpatrick, 1998, Should we be worried. What the research says about gender differences in access, use, attitudes, and achievement with computers, Educational Technology, 56
  15. Kirkup, 1995, Gender issues and learning technologies, British Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 218, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.1995.tb00344.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.1995.tb00344.x
  16. Lazinger, 1997, Internet use by faculty members in various disciplines: a comparative case study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 508, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<508::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-Y · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199706)48:6<508::aid-asi4>3.0.co;2-y
  17. Martin, 1992, American and Soviet children’s attitudes toward computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 155, 10.2190/QJJF-31UU-FR0X-KLTG · doi:10.2190/qjjf-31uu-fr0x-kltg
  18. McMahon, J. (1997). Factors associated with student computer usage in higher education, unpublished PhD thesis, The Queen’s University of Belfast.
  19. Omar, 1992, Attitudes of college students towards computers: a comparative study in the United States and the Middle East, Computers in Human Behaviour, 8, 249, 10.1016/0747-5632(92)90009-4 · doi:10.1016/0747-5632(92)90009-4

Cited by

See all 640

Metadata

Authors
Li, N., & Kirkup, G.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
301-317
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
OpenAlex
W2106306387
Cited by
640
References
42
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
The paper
Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.