Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,060

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies

Margaryan, Anoush, Littlejohn, Allison, Vojt, Gabrielle·2011·Computers & Education

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bennett, 2008, The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 775, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Daly, 2002, Bias in qualitative research designs, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 26, 299, 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00174.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2002.tb00174.x
  3. Dede, 2005, Planning for neomillennial learning styles, EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 28, 7
  4. Harris, 2010, Small steps across the chasm: ideas for embedding a culture of open education in the university sector, Education, 16
  5. Kennedy, 2008, First year students’ experiences with technology: are they digital natives?, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 108, 10.14742/ajet.1233 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kirkwood, 2005, Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses?, Studies in Higher Education, 30, 257, 10.1080/03075070500095689 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Littlejohn, 2010, Exploring students’ use of ICT and expectations of learning methods, Electronic Journal of E-Learning (IJEL), 8
  8. Selwyn, 2009, The digital native: myth and reality, Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61, 364, 10.1108/00012530910973776 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Trigwell, 1999, Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning, Higher Education, 37, 57, 10.1023/A:1003548313194 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Virtanen, 2009, University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences, Instructional Science, 38, 355, 10.1007/s11251-008-9088-z · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,060

Metadata

Authors
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
429-440
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064141926
Cited by
1,060
References
3
FWCI
73.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
The paper
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.