The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement and evidence of computer-based task switching and multitasking by ‘Net Generation’ students
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As demonstrated by Judd and Kennedy (2011), a student with a specific goal and sufficient motivation, such as studying for an upcoming exam in a difficult class, is less likely to multitask.”
From Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance (2018) · cites this paper as Judd & Kennedy, 2011
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, students with less consequential goals, such as communicating with friends for leisure via Facebook or email, are more likely to multitask.”
From Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance (2018) · cites this paper as Judd & Kennedy, 2011
Citations
Cites
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424816 · Cited by 11,104
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
(2012) · Corwin Press eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483387765.n6 · Cited by 7,116
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently?
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424843 · Cited by 4,035
The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x · Cited by 2,971
Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation
Tapscott, D. (1997) · Cited by 2,728
Oblinger, D. G., Oblinger, J. L., & Lippincott, J. K. (2005) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 2,290
Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds
Foehr, U. G., Rideout, V. J., & Roberts, D. F. (2010) · Cited by 2,197
Cognitive control in media multitaskers
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903620106 · Cited by 1,810
Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.763 · Cited by 1,207
First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?
Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K. M., & Krause, K.-L. D. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1233 · Cited by 1,120
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Oblinger, 2004, The next generation of digital engagement, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004
- Rubenstein, 2001, Cognitive processes in task switching, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763, 10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.763 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying
Rosen, L. D., Mark Carrier, L., & Cheever, N. A. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001 · Cited by 875
The Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale: An empirical investigation
Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., & Rokkum, J. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006 · Cited by 788
Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. E. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018 · Cited by 365
May, K. E., & Elder, A. D. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z · Cited by 287
Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking
Carrier, L. M., Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., & Lim, A. F. (2015) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.005 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Judd, T., & Kennedy, G.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Judd, Terry
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 625-631
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079620095
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- task switching, multitasking, digital natives, medical students, internet use, gender differences, international students, graduate students, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
