Cited by 30Writing and Handwriting EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Electronic outlining as a writing strategy: Effects on students' writing products, mental effort and writing process

Open access
de Smet, Milou J.R., Brand-Gruwel, Saskia, Leijten, Mariëlle, Kirschner, Paul A.·2014·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.010

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Smet, M. J. R., Brand-Gruwel, S., Leijten, M., & Kirschner, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
78
Pages
352-366
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051726977
Cited by
30
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Kennisnet Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
writing strategies, argumentative writing, writing process, cognitive effort, writing fluency, text planning, text structure, revision, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review