The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 · Cited by 5,936
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187
Six views of embodied cognition
Wilson, M. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196322 · Cited by 4,782
HMELO-SILVER, C. E., DUNCAN, R. G., & CHINN, C. A. (2007) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701263368 · Cited by 2,641
Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem
Johnstone, A. H. (1991) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x · Cited by 1,321
Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013 · Cited by 992 · cited 1×
“…have been successfully implemented in science classrooms to help students develop explanations of complex science topics (Bell & Trundle, 2008; Carlsen & Andre, 1992; Chiu & Linn, 2014; Höffler & Leutner, 2007; Honey & Hilton, 2011; Jaakola, Nurmi, & Veermans, 2011; Windschitl & Andre, 1998).”
BackgroundWhite, R., & Gunstone, R. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9780203761342 · Cited by 894
Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning
Lowe, R. (2004) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.003 · Cited by 312 · cited 3×
“However, research also demonstrates how students using visualizations can focus on superficial aspects (Lowe, 2004), overestimate their understanding (Chiu & Linn, 2012), and fail to connect virtual representations to the depicted real-life scientific phenomena (Chiu, 2010).”
Background
Cited by
Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis
Heradio, R., de la Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010 · Cited by 574
Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9 · Cited by 562
Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001 · Cited by 491
A review of using Augmented Reality in Education from 2011 to 2016
Chen, P., Liu, X., Cheng, W., & Huang, R. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Educational Technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2419-1_2 · Cited by 474
Augmented reality in STEM education: a systematic review
Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J., & Chao, J.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 59-73
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061982661
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 57.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.007
- The paper
- Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J., & Chao, J. (2015). The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
