The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of Social Media for teaching in higher education
Abstract
Social Media tools are seen by many authors as powerful drivers of change for teaching and learning practices, in terms of openness, interactivity and sociability. However, extensive surveys about actual use that are carried out with large samples at a national level are rare. This study reports the results of a survey addressed to the Italian academic staff, with the aim of identifying the uses of Social Media in the field of university teaching practices. The response rate was 10.5%, corresponding to 6139. The respondents were asked to identify frequency of use, motivations, teaching practices and obstacles related to the use of a number of tools: generic social network sites (Twitter, Facebook), professional and academic networking services (LinkedIn, ResearchGate and Academia.edu), tools to write and comment (blogs, wikis) and to archive and retrieve content material for lectures and group work (podcasts, YouTube and Vimeo, SlideShare). Analyses of data tested which socio-demographic variables mostly affected frequency of use, and the relationships between motivations, ways of use, barriers to use and the scientific discipline. The results show that Social Media use is still rather limited and restricted and that academics are not much inclined to integrate these devices into their practices for several reasons, such as cultural resistance, pedagogical issues or institutional constraints. However, there are differences among academics in the ways they use Social Media or perceive them, mostly depending on the scientific discipline of teaching. Overall, the results emphasise ambivalent attitudes towards the benefits and challenges of Social Media in the context of higher education with obstacles prevailing over advantages. We examine the frequency of use of Social Media for teaching purposes.The variable most associated with frequency of use is scientific discipline.We present motivations and ways to use Social Media tools in teaching.A principal component analysis reveals three main factors as obstacles to use.Results show a complex scenario where potentials and barriers are intertwined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875 · cited 2×
“Other scholars have provided tentative definitions, such as that according to which Social Media are “a group of Internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0, and that allow the creation and exchange of User Generated Content” (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010, p. 61).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?
Nulty, D. D. (2008) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930701293231 · Cited by 2,581
Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use
McAndrew, F. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.007 · Cited by 425
Cited by
Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312 · Cited by 631
Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube
Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001 · Cited by 398
Sobaih, A. E. E., Hasanein, A. M., & Abu Elnasr, A. E. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12166520 · Cited by 348
Teaching “Against” Social Media: Confronting Problems of Profit in the Curriculum
Krutka, D. G., Manca, S., Galvin, S. M., Greenhow, C., Koehler, M. J., & Askari, E. (2019) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811912101410 · Cited by 97
Self-citationBalakrishnan, V., Teoh, K. K., Pourshafie, T., & Liew, T. K. (2016) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.2469 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Manca, S., & Ranieri, M.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 216-230
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2259026301
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 104.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of Social Media for teaching in higher education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012
- The paper
- Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of Social Media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.