Cited by 160Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

What affects learner's higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors

Lee, Jihyun, Choi, Hyoseon·2017·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.015

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J., & Choi, H.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Choi, Hyoseon
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
115
Pages
143-152
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2725772702
Cited by
160
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7
FWCI
15.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
higher-order thinking skills, technology-enhanced learning environments, learner factors, deep learning approach, epistemological beliefs, learning methods, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review