Cited by 1,561Educational Methods and AnalysisDigital literacy in educationGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21 st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies

Open access
Voogt, Joke, Roblin, Natalie Pareja·2012·Journal of Curriculum Studies

Abstract

National curricula need to change drastically to comply with the competences needed for the 21st century. In this paper eight frameworks describing 21st century competences were analysed. A comprehensive search for information about 21st century competences was conducted across the official websites of the selected frameworks, resulting in 32 documents that were analysed in detail. Travers and Westbury’s framework of curriculum representations was used to determine horizontal and vertical consistency between the frameworks. The frameworks were compared on their underlying rationales and goals, their definition of 21st century competences, and the recommended strategies for the implementation and assessment of these skills in educational practice. In addition three international studies were examined to analyse how various countries (EU member states, OECD countries) and schools (SITES studies) deal (or not) with 21st century competences. The findings indicate a large extent of alignment between the frameworks about what 21st century competences are and why they are important (horizontal consistency), but intentions and practice seemed still far apart, indicating lack of vertical consistency. The implications of the implementation of 21st century competences in national curriculum policies are discussed and recommendations are provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. In J. Voogt and G. Knezek (eds), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (New York: Springer), 5-22.
  2. Dede, C. (2010a) Technological supports for acquiring 21 st century skills. In E. Baker, B. McGaw and P. Peterson (eds), International Encyclopedia of Education, 3 rd Edition (Oxford, UK: Elsevier). Available online at: http://learningcenter.nsta.org/products/ symposia_seminars/iste/files/Technological_Support_for_21stCentury_Encyclo_dede. pdf, accessed 10 January 2010.
  3. Dede, C. (2010b) Comparing frameworks for 21 st century skills. In J. Bellanca and R. Brandt (eds), 21 st century skills (Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press), 51-76.
  4. European Parliament (2007) Key Competences for Lifelong Learning: A European Reference Framework. Annex of a Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning, Official Journal of the European Union, 30.12.2006/L394. Available online at: http://ec. europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/publ/pdf/ll-learning/keycomp_en.pdf, accessed 18 January 2010.
  5. Kozma, R. B. (ed.) (2003) Technology, innovation and educational change: a global perspec- tive (Eugene, OR: ISTE).
  6. Levy, F. and Murnane, R. J. (2004) The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  7. Rychen, D., Salganik, L. and McLaughlin, M. (eds) (2003) Definition and selection of key competences. Contributions to the second DeSeCo symposium (Neuchatel: Swiss Federal Statistical Office).
  8. Trier, U. (2003) Twelve countries contributing to DeSeCo: A summary report. In D. Rychen, L. Salganik and M. McLaughlin (eds), Definition and selection of key compe- tences. Contributions to the second DeSeCo symposium (Neuchatel: Swiss Federal Statis- tical Office), 7-59.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Voogt, Joke
Venue
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Published
2012-06
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
299-321
ISSN
  • 0022-0272 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5839
OpenAlex
W2101751396
Cited by
1,561
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 189 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 162 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 188 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
FWCI
122.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Curriculum Studies (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
21st century competences, national curriculum policy, curriculum representation, curriculum implementation, competency assessment, OECD countries, EU member states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review