Cited by 17EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and Analytics

Development of a computer-aided education system inspired by face-to-face learning by incorporating EEG-based neurofeedback into online video lectures

Kim, Hodam, Chae, Younsoo, Kim, Suhye, Im, Chang-Hwan·2023·IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

Abstract

Owing to the rapid development of information and communication technologies, online or mobile learning content is widely available on the Internet. Unlike traditional face-to-face learning, online learning exhibits a critical limitation: real-time interactions between learners and teachers are generally not feasible in online learning. To overcome this issue, we implemented an online learning system based on electroencephalography (EEG)-based passive brain-computer interface technology referred to as the “adaptive neuro-learning system (ANLS).” It monitors the current mental states of learners seamlessly using EEG signals. Then, it adaptively provides natural and interactive video feedback rather than simple alarms or pop quizzes following the current mental conditions of a learner. In this article, a total of 60 university students were assigned randomly to one of four groups: two experimental groups, for which either ANLS based on attention state estimation or ANLS based on both attention and comprehension states estimation was tested, and two control groups, the students in which were taught using either the conventional online lecture without feedback or an online course with randomized video feedbacks. Each member of these groups attended a 53 min open courseware video lecture. Then, the educational effects of the proposed system were evaluated quantitatively via a written examination. Our results revealed a significantly higher learning performance for the experimental group (average test score of the experimental groups = 83.83 and that of the control groups = 56.67), demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed education strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tlt.2022.3200394

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H., Chae, Y., Kim, S., & Im, C.-H.
Affiliations
Hanyang University (KR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
78-91
ISSN
  • 1939-1382 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-0050
OpenAlex
W4292979906
Cited by
17
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2019R1A2C2086593)
  • Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (2020-0-01373)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
EEG-based neurofeedback, online learning, adaptive learning systems, passive brain-computer interface, video feedback, computer-assisted instruction, learning performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review