Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions

Chien, Shu-Yun, Hwang, Gwo-Jen, Jong, Morris Siu-Yung·2020·Computers & Education

Abstract

Abstract English has been recognized as a means of communication around the globe. However, owing to the lack of realistic English practicing contexts, EFL (English as Foreign Language) students generally have few opportunities to communicate with people in English, not to mention to get feedback from others for making reflections. In this study, a spherical video-based virtual reality (SVVR) environment was developed to situate students in authentic English-speaking contexts; moreover, the peer assessment (PA) strategy was employed for guiding students to provide comments on peers' speaking performance and to make reflections on their own performance. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, an experiment was conducted in a high school English course. The experiment results reveal more positive effects of the peer-assessment-based SVVR approach compared with the non-peer-assessment-based SVVR approach in terms of the learners' English speaking, learning motivation, and critical thinking skills, as well as reducing their English learning anxiety. Moreover, it was found that the ratings of the students were statistically correlated with those of the teacher. This study further analyzed the types of peer comments by categorizing them into four types: Praise, Criticism, Opinion, and Irrelevant. It was found that Praise feedback was helpful for the students' English-speaking performance, while Criticism feedback might have been unfavorable in this case. Additionally, Irrelevant feedback was not significantly correlated with the students’ performance in the earlier PA stage, but had a significantly negative correlation in the later stage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Austin, 2017, Video conferencing and multimodal expression of voice: Children's conversations using Skype for second language development in a telecollaborative setting, System, 64, 87, 10.1016/j.system.2016.12.003 · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.003
  2. Authors, 2009, Computers & Education
  3. Jung, 2017, Robust upright adjustment of 360 spherical panoramas, The Visual Computer, 33, 737, 10.1007/s00371-017-1368-7 · doi:10.1007/s00371-017-1368-7
  4. Kabilan, 2000, Creative and critical thinking in language classrooms, The Internet TESL Journal, 6, 1
  5. Pham, 2018, Virtual field trip for mobile construction safety education using 360-degree panoramic virtual reality, International Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 1174
  6. See, 2015, Virtual reality 360 interactive panorama reproduction obstacles and issues, Virtual Reality, 19, 71, 10.1007/s10055-014-0258-9 · doi:10.1007/s10055-014-0258-9
  7. Zhang, 2009, Reading to speak: Integrating oral communication skills, Vol. 47, 32
  8. Zhang, 2018, Using computer speech recognition technology to evaluate spoken English, Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 18, 1341

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Chien, S.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Jong, M. S.-Y.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
146
Pages
103751
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2986776799
Cited by
438
References
63
FWCI
179.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
The paper
Chien, S.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.