The DOI matches its Crossref record; 177 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding academics' adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Technology diffusion in universities is a complicated process, which often faces multifaceted challenges rooted in both organizational and cultural aspects of HEIs [30,31].”
From AI Governance in Higher Education: Case Studies of Guidance at Big Ten Universities (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Using the technology acceptance framework to design faculty development primarily predicts adoption intention [6, 7] rather than use and performance outcomes needed in actual educational practice [1].”
In the citing paper
“Faculty members' views on the adoption and use of AI in teaching practices, as well as their interest in professional development regarding AI for teaching and learning, have been relatively underexplored (Liu et al., 2020).”
From Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs (2024) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Self‐determination theory and work motivation
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.322 · Cited by 7,757
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
GREENHALGH, T., ROBERT, G., MACFARLANE, F., BATE, P., & KYRIAKIDOU, O. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x · Cited by 7,448
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems
Weick, K. E. (1976) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391875 · Cited by 5,142
On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.003 · Cited by 3,418
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Educational Technology Adoption: A systematic review
Granić, A. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7 · Cited by 526
Moro, C., Birt, J., Štromberga, Z., Phelps, C., Clark, J. M., Glasziou, P., & Scott, A. M. (2020) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2049 · Cited by 331
Fear from COVID-19 and technology adoption: the impact of Google Meet during Coronavirus pandemic
Al-Maroof, R. S., Salloum, S. A., Hassanien, A. E., & Shaalan, K. F. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1830121 · Cited by 279
Mittal, A., Mantri, A., Tandon, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-09-2020-0114 · Cited by 234
Dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap kepuasan pembelajaran jarak jauh
Napitupulu, R. M. (2020) · Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan · doi:10.21831/jitp.v7i1.32771 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Qian
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 103857
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3008352202
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 178
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 23
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Auckland
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital Transformation of Higher Education
- Keywords
- learning technology adoption, university faculty, higher education, technology adoption factors, adoption strategies, faculty technology use, educational technology implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
