The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics
Abstract
Abstract Most university degrees often require students to demonstrate proficiency in mathematics, which is the basic requirement in many fields, such as science, engineering, or technology. Mathematical knowledge is so common as to be essential in higher education. Although mathematical skills are crucial to the success of study in many domains, a large number of students are not willing to study related courses. Anxiety and pressure triggered by previous failures in mathematic learning are considered as the reason. The online learning environment provides students with opportunities to exchange opinions with others and facilitate their self-regulated learning. Scholars believe that the learning performances of students can be enhanced if they make reference to other students' learning strategies during the study process. The practice of making references to other students' learning strategies and mutually monitoring each other during the study process is called social regulation. The study efficiency of social regulation in learning mathematics will need to be verified. This study has adopted a social regulation-based online learning approach for assisting students in achieving learning goals with peers' power. At the same time, this study conducted an experiment with an experimental group and a control group. The social regulation-based online learning approach was used by the experimental group while the conventional self-regulated learning approach was used by the control group. According to the results, the social regulation-based online learning approach enhances students' learning achievements and learning motivations in mathematics. Based on the results of the sequential pattern analysis for investigating the online learning behaviors of the two groups of students, students who use the social regulation-based online learning approach have more positive online learning behaviors, such as reading the supplementary materials regarding the wrongly answered questions and revising the notes. On the contrary, students who use the conventional self-regulated learning approach only pay attention to the results of tests and feedback provided by their teacher. They seldom have behaviors of looking at the supplementary materials, adding or deleting notes. With the above verification, the developed system of this study not only enhances students’ learning performances, but also guides them to have more meaningful learning behaviors in mathematics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173
(2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-109890-2.x5027-6 · Cited by 4,409
A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 · Cited by 3,807
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312909 · Cited by 3,735
Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis
Willson, V. L., Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164658 · Cited by 2,301
Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544 · Cited by 2,254
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51 · Cited by 1,825
How to Solve It : A New Aspect of Mathematical Method
Pólya, G. (2014) · Cited by 1,416
Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004 · Cited by 1,283
Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001 · Cited by 1,031
Cited by
Fang, J.-W., He, L.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., Zhu, X.-W., Bian, C.-N., & Fu, Q.-K. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2061013 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, G.-J., Wang, S.-Y., & Lai, C.-L.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 160
- Pages
- 104031
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3089852400
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 67.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031
- The paper
- Hwang, G.-J., Wang, S.-Y., & Lai, C.-L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.